ACE Video Blog 3 on the Pattern of Cover-Ups and Lies About Consequences of Radiation Exposure From Nuclear Plant Accidents and Meltdowns

 

ACE Video / Blog – Part 3

The Truth and Consequences of Radiation Exposure

From Nuclear Plant Accidents / Meltdowns

Truth and Consequences of Radiation From Meltdowns Must Be Fully Disclosed So That People In The Greater Philadelphia Region Begin To Understand Why More Protective Limerick Nuclear Plant Emergency and Evacuation Planning Is Imperative

· The Pattern of Unethical Deception About Radiation Exposure After Meltdowns Has Created Disastrous Situations, Needlessly Magnifying Harms For Millions.

­ Victims Were Not Evacuated Soon Enough or Far Enough Away From Meltdowns. They Suffered Needlessly.

­ People Failed To Take Precautionary Actions Because They Were Lied To About Radiation Releases.

· Cover-Ups, Lies, and Secrecy About Radiation Releases and Their Consequences From Meltdowns Must Be Revealed – It’s About Ethics, Human Rights, and Minimizing Harms.

· Government and the Nuclear Industry Deceive The Public. They Manipulate Public Opinion To Reduce Opposition to Nuclear Power To Prevent Collapse of the Nuclear Industry.

· Deaths and Harmful Health Impacts Have Been Deliberately Underestimated – Using Dilution, Discounting Internal Radiation Exposure, Ignoring Diseases Other Than Cancer, Using Deceptive Testing and Estimates.

· The Truth About Consequences of Meltdowns Has Been Suppressed and Withheld – Through Worldwide Censorship of Media and Misleading Industry Propaganda That Denies Reality.

Once a Large Amount of Radiation Enters An Ecosystem It Quickly Becomes Widespread, Contaminating Water, Soil, Plants, Animals, and People

· Radiation is invisible – It also can’t be tasted, smelled, or felt by victims.

· Evidence shows radiation from meltdowns contaminates air, water, soil, and food hundreds of miles away from meltdowns.

· As Radiation moves up the food chain, it Bioaccumulates, Bioconcentrates, and Biomagnifies

· Example: Ingestion of foods contaminated with even “low levels” of radioactive cesium leads to bioaccumulation in the liver, kidneys, small intestines, pancreas, spleen, and heart and endocrine tissues.

· Children are most susceptible to effects of radiation on their internal organs.

· There is “NO SAFE RADIATION DOSE” according to The National Academy of Sciences, Physicians for Social Responsibility, and other experts.

People In The Greater Philadelphia Region Must Have Immediate Notification Of A Limerick Nuclear Plant

Radiation Accident or Meltdown With Expanded Evacuation and Ingestion Pathway Zones

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Has Lost All Credibility

NRC’S LUDICROUS DECEPTION

Fukushima was the worst nuclear disaster in history, expected by independent experts to have worse radiation consequences than Chernobyl – estimated to have released radiation 20 times Chernobyl.

Soon after Fukushima’s meltdowns started, many Japanese people far beyond the evacuation zone started showing signs of radiation poisoning, especially children. Related deaths were certified by officials in 13 Prefectures.

Yet, NRC Told 3,000 Nuclear Experts From 34 Countries:

Fukushima Did Not Result In Big Radiation Doses to the General Population. Immediate Health Consequences Were “Very Close To Nothing,” With “Little To No” Long-Term Health Effects.

Probably Met NRC Safety Goals.

NRC Needs New Standards For Fukushima Type Disasters.

How Can We Believe NRC About Anything?

NRC Protects Nuclear Industry Profits At The Expense Of Public Health and Safety

· NRC is failing in its mission to protect public health and safety.

· In spite of credible evidence from Chernobyl and Fukushima meltdowns proving radiation released travels hundreds of miles and has devastating impacts on health, especially for children, and in spite of NRC warning U.S. citizens to evacuate 50 miles from Fukushima, NRC is still denying the need to expand U.S. evacuation zones beyond 10 miles and ingestion pathway zones beyond 50 miles.

· NRC disregards reliable independent scientific research and fails to fully disclose harmful impacts from routine and accidental radiation releases with deceptively designed word-smithing.

NRC is using industry biased studies to deceive the public about actual consequences of radiation exposure from meltdowns.

NRC is refusing to provide more realistic protective planning for Limerick Nuclear Plant and others.

Flawed MIT Study Is Being Used By NRC

To Dismiss The Need For Nuclear Disaster Evacuations

(May 25th, 2012) Previous Study Disputes MIT Claim (Tanaka et al , 2009)

The flawed study discounted credible human data compiled after Chernobyl and Fukushima meltdowns.

MIT Awarded More Than $2 Million in Grants And Fellowships

(May 21, 2012) http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/mit-doe-grants-fellowships.html Nuclear science and engineering

$1.65 million was awarded through grants from the Department of Energy Nuclear Energy University Programs and $450,000 was awarded through graduate student fellowships. “Scholarship for Nuclear Communications and Methods for Evaluation of Nuclear Project Acceptability” will develop a model to characterize the factors affecting social acceptance of nuclear projects by potential stakeholders.

MIT Mouse Radiation Study Is Science Fiction (June 7th, 2012 Video)

See Why MIT’s study is pure science fiction, not fact: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8YFe6Q08M8&feature=em-subs_digest

NRC’s response to Fukushima meltdowns was to ignore reality and arrange for MIT do a selection-bias study, using a 35-day short-term mouse study to make it seem as if impacts from radiation exposure are harmless. The MIT study excluded extensive evidence of genetic damage to humans living in a radiation-contaminated environment. Nineteen groups of Children from Chernobyl showed lasting genetic damage from radiation.

A Radioactive Conflict of Interest (June 25th, 2012)

Having the Energy Department control radiation health research makes as much sense as giving tobacco companies the authority to see if smoking is bad for you.

MIT Confronted With Its Malpractice of Science (June 25, 2012)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-alvarez/mit-radiation-study_b_1623899.html

The MIT Radiation Study Was Confronted With Its Malpractice Of Science. The Study Protocol was flawed. It’s the worst kind of bias, the kind paid to ignore human suffering. “It’s difficult to get someone to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.”

MIT Mouse Study Debunked In Journal (November 13th, 2012)

Biased Protocols Included:

· The use of genetically altered FYDR mice for one portion of the study but not the comparison groups.

· The wide range in the numbers of mice used in the comparison groups.

· The time frame was too short (Tanaka paper)

· External radiation was the only radiation studied. Internal radiation was not studied, but presents the bigger risk.

· The study left out crucial information that children may have a 3-fold higher risk for damage from radiation at half the accumulated MIT dose.

Independent Research And Evidence Dispel MIT’s Radiation Deception:

A body of independent research on radiation, as well as evidence from actual meltdowns, reveal the truth and consequences of radiation exposure from nuclear plants like Limerick.

· There is NO safe level of radiation exposure, according to the National Academy of Sciences and Physicians for Social Responsibility.

· Ionizing radiation from nuclear plants damages living things and can contaminate the environment permanently.

· Nuclear Plant radiation mutates genes which can cause genetic damage across generations.

· U.S. and European studies have all shown increases in cancer around nuclear facilities.

· Drastic increases in cancer are documented, especially in children, in communities near Limerick Nuclear Plant and Montgomery County, home of Limerick Nuclear Plant , since Limerick Nuclear Plant started operating in1985. (See ACE Website Download #2: “Cancer – Skyrocketing Increases: Links to Limerick”)

Human Health Consequences Resulting From Radiation Releases After Meltdowns At Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three Mile Island Have Been Revealed By Independent Research:

· Based on the amount of radiation releases over 1.5 million excess cancers are expected from Fukushima.

· Over 1.5 million excess cancers occurred over 25 years from Chernobyl, “Consequences To People And The Environment” – New York Academy of Science nyas.org/annals

· Partial meltdown at TMI may have caused 50,000 to 100,000 excess deaths. Read: “Deadly Deceit: Low Level Radiation – High Level Cover-up” by Jay Gould and Ben Goldman, 1990

Radiation and Public Health Project Director, Joseph Mangano’s Two Excellent Books Reveal Truth And Consequences About Radiation Exposure

· “RADIOACTIVE BABY TEETH: THE CANCER LINK”

The Only Study Of Radiation Levels In Bodies Of Americans Living Near Nuclear Plants – Includes Data On Limerick Nuclear Plant.

· “MAD SCIENCE: THE NUCLEAR POWER EXPERIMENT”

Includes An Account of Consequences From Nuclear Accidents and Meltdowns, Plus A Point-by-Point Refutation of Pro-Nuke Arguments.

“There Is NO Safe Level Of Radionuclide Exposure Whether From Food, Water, Or Other Sources. PERIOD!”

Dr. Jeff Patterson, Former President of Physicians for Social Responsibility, Said:

Exposure to Radionuclides, like Iodine-131 and Cesium-137, INCREASES Risk of Cancer.”

Radiation Exposure Can Affect The Whole Body

The broad range of radionuclides that are present in radioactive releases from nuclear power plants have been linked to damage to: Bladder, Bone, Brain, Breast, Kidneys, Liver, Lungs, Muscles, Ovaries, Pancreas, Skin, Spleen, Thyroid

Radiation Sickness Symptoms Appear in One to Four Weeks and Can Be Mistaken for Other Illnesses Like the Flu:

· Within the first twenty-four hours, symptoms can include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fever, etc.

· Within one to four weeks, symptoms can include dizziness, disorientation, weakness and fatigue, hair loss, bloody vomit and stools, infections, poor wound healing, and low blood pressure.

There Is No Way to Undo Damaging Effects Of Radiation Exposure

To Minimize Exposure

· Time Limit Exposure

· Distance Between You and Radiation

· Shielding Learn About Best Sheltering Procedures

For Radiation Exposure Summaries See: www.acereport.org

#1 Radiation – Limerick’s Routine Releases

#3 Radiation – No Safe dose

#4 Radiation – Reduce Risk

Over 8 Million People Live Within 50 Miles Of Limerick

How Close Do You Live To Limerick Nuclear Plant?

See Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)

Radiation Plume Map www.nrdc.org

RADIATION EXPOSURE CAN BE MINIMIZED

RELATED TO A LIMERICK ACCIDENT / MELTDOWN

WITH MORE PROTECTIVE UP-FRONT EMERGENCY AND EVACUATION PLANNING

Contact Elected Officials Today To Demand That NRC Require More Protective Emergency Planning Including:

1. Immediate Public Notification By Exelon and NRC

2. Independent Radiation Monitoring With Electronic

Radiation Alert System

3. A 50-Mile Evacuation Zone

4. A 100-Mile Ingestion Pathway Zone

Fukushima and Chernobyl Meltdowns Prove Radioactive Fallout Traveled Far Greater Distances Than 50 Miles. The Radioactive Ingestion Pathway Went Far Beyond 100 Miles.

Facts About Fukushima Fallout:

· Japan’s long-lived radiation contaminated more than 11,500 square miles. (Reported 11-11)

· An area almost the size of Connecticut (some 4,500 square miles) was found to have radiation levels exceeding Japan’s shameful highly inflated allowable radiation limit.

· The radioactively-contaminated exclusion zones surrounding Fukushima cover more than 300 square miles.

Facts About Chernobyl Fallout:

· Evacuations spread over the years as far as 200 miles away from the reactor. Approximately 350,400 people were evacuated from the areas surrounding Chernobyl.

· 80 square miles were declared too radioactive for human habitation and declared a permanent “exclusion” zone.

Yet, Limerick’s Emergency and Evacuation Zone Remains Set At Only 10-Miles. Limerick’s Ingestion Pathway Zone Remains Set At Just 50 Miles. This Is Negligence!

1974 Reactor Safety Study Published by NRC (Referred To As The Rasmussen Report)

· 45,000 Radiation Sickness Cases (Requiring Hospitalization)

· 3,300 Deaths (From Acute Radiation Sickness)

· 45,000 Fatal Cancers (over 50 years)

· 250,000 Non-Fatal Cancers (over 50 years)

· 190 Children Born With Birth Defects Per Year

Note: Non-Insurable Property Damage Was Estimated At $14 Billion

NRC’s Estimated Consequences For An Accident At Limerick Nuclear Power Plant, Reported To Congress In 1982 (Referred to as the CRAC Report):

· 74,000 Early Fatalities

· 610,000 Early Injuries

· 34,000 Cancer Deaths

Census Records From 1980 to 2010 Show That These Numbers Would Be Drastically Higher Today.

This Population Increase Demands Updated Planning.

The Following News Articles and Reports Provide Overwhelming Evidence Of NRC’s Negligent, Ineffective, Unprotective Policies:

· 03/21/11 NRC Increases Estimated “Background” Doses to Radiation Again

· 04/05/11 “NRC’s Pro-Nuke Spin on Evacuation Zones”

· 06/02/11 Some fear U.S. nuclear agency is playing ‘regulatory roulette’

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/US/06/01/nuclear.plant.regulation/index.html

· 07/29/11 NRC Lowers Estimate of How Many Would Die in Meltdown By Matthew Wald

· 08/30/11 NRC: Update evacuation plans near nuclear plants AP – By Matthew Daly

Article exposes no changes to evacuation zones which have remained frozen at a 10-mile radius around each

plant since they were set in 1978, regardless of aging reactors operating at higher power, risking larger

radioactive releases, and skyrocketing populations around some plants – as high as 4 1/2 times higher.

· 09/11/11 Agencies Struggle To Craft Offsite Cleanup Plan For Nuclear Power Accidents November 10, 2010

http://insideepa.com/Inside-EPA-General/Inside-EPA-Public-Content/agencies-struggle-to-craft-offsite-cleanup-plan- for-nuclear-power-accidents/menu-id-565.html

While no agency is taking responsibility for attempting to clean up after a nuclear disaster, all these agencies ignore or miss the fact that nuclear “accidents” NEVER end. Will they ever admit that a nuclear plant worst case scenario is likely to be just too bad to clean up?

NRC and Industry’s Attempt To Hide The Real Risk From Nuclear Plant Radiation

Bogus Comparisons:

· The nuclear industry and NRC intentionally ignore and deny harms from continuous routine radiation exposure from nuclear plant releases. They repeatedly, absurdly dismiss harm from continuous exposure to over 100 radionuclides routinely discharged from nuclear plants and make bogus comparisons to radiation from sunshine, X-rays, and airplane trips.

· The broad range of nuclear plant radionuclides routinely released cause additive, cumulative, and synergistic internal and external radiation damage. Once in the ecosystem, people living in the region of a nuclear plant cannot avoid these exposures. They cannot see it, taste it, feel it, or smell it.

 

ACE Video Blog 2 on Calls for Immediate Notification and Expanded Evacuation and Ingestion Pathway Zones

 

 ACE Report Blog Series

Alliance For A Clean Environment  www.acereport.org

Minimizing Chaos and Reducing Radiation Exposure By Improving Limerick

Nuclear Plant’s Flawed And Inadequate Emergency and Evacuation Plans.

Part #2    January 2013

Calls For Immediate Notification and Expanded Evacuation and Ingestion Pathway Zones

Many expressed concerns and are calling for more precautionary emergency and evacuation planning, including the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), the Union of Concerned Scientists, Senator Bob Casey (D-PA),  Associated Press Investigative Report, Pottstown Mercury, The Alliance For A Clean Environment (ACE), and many residents living around Limerick Nuclear Power Plant.

National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filed an appeal in 2011, related to Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Outdated Severe Accident Mitigation Alternatives, Including Assessing Consequences of a Limerick Accident or Terrorist Attack.

NRDC won in the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia.

Due to Limerick’s location, the potential impact of a severe accident would be far greater than at most other U.S. nuclear plants (NRDC research).  Over 8 million people live within 50 miles of Limerick, the radius NRC told Americans to evacuate in Japan during the Fukushima accident.   There are 1,914 Public Schools and 176 Hospitals within 50 miles.  (See NRDC Plume Map www.nrdc.org)

Evacuation planning for health risks from radiation exposure are being ignored, even though up to 1.4 million additional people now living downwind in the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Newark metropolitan area need to be addressed also.

In spite of the court ruling, NRC is refusing to consider increased population and health risks associated with a Limerick Nuclear Plant accident / meltdown.

NRC displayed a grotesque dereliction of duty when they joined Exelon in appealing the court’s decision.

During the hearing NRC made no pretense of being a neutral arbitrator, much less the public’s advocate and protector.

NRDC’s director of the nuclear program said, “After Fukushima, it seems just plain nutty not to require a new studyIt’s hard to believe that after the severity of the Fukushima disaster, involving BWR reactors similar to Limerick’s, that Exelon and NRC blithely maintain they have no reason to take another look at Limerick’s Severe Accident Mitigation Analysis.”

The Union of Concerned Scientists senior scientist said, “…they have not taken into account the issues associated with uncontrolled population growth very close to [nuclear] plants.”   (ABC news 6-27-11)

U.S. Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) urged immediate review  of Nuclear Evacuation Zones in a March 2012 letter to NRC.  Senator Casey Said,  “My Constituents Are Deeply Concerned About The Emergency Evacuation Plans. They deserve to know that all aspects of our preparedness plans have been re-evaluated in the wake of the disaster in Japan.  One year after Japan’s disaster, it is time that millions of Pennsylvanians living in close proximity to nuclear power plants know that unique characteristics of each plant are taken into account in the development of evacuation plans.”  Population densities and transportation infrastructure changed since these plants were first built.  Such changes must affect how NRC determines appropriate evacuation distances.

The Associated Press 2011 Investigative Report (PART III by Jeff Donn) “Populations Around US Nuke Plants Soar” has direct implications for Limerick Nuclear Plant Evacuation Plans.  (See entire summary in ACE Blog at www.acereport.org).  Highlights below:

Despite all that happened since nuclear plant radiation accidents at TMI, Chernobyl, and Fukushima, evacuation zones have remained frozen at a 10-mile radius since 1978.

Increased dangers and mounting risks have NOT resulted in more protective preparations.

AP reported that NRC, working with the nuclear industry, repeatedly weakened or failed to enforce safety standards.

1998 federal regulations show low-population areas were “preferred” for siting nuclear plants to limit exposure to radiation accidents as part of accident safeguards.

Limerick, about 21 miles from Philadelphia, was not a low-density population area in the 1970s and population has increased dramatically since then.   

Radiation releases happen within the first 1/2 hour of an accident, a fact acknowledged by NRC and FEMA.

NRC has allowed profits to outweigh public health and safety.  

NRC minimizes and rubber stamps evacuation plans, even though they are symbolic, rather than functional, just to keep nuclear plants operating.

NRC is playing with numbers to minimize presumed impacts of accidents.  

Partial drills every two years, with limited accountability for effectiveness, is woefully inadequate.

If NRC required meaningful standards for evacuation emergency plans, there would be no nuclear power plants in populated areas.   Population booms near nuclear reactor sites like Limerick minimally call for stronger evacuation standards, but little has been done.  Compliance with comprehensive evacuation plans based on current demographics would necessitate closing nuclear plants in densely populated regions like Limerick.

Pottstown Mercury Articles and Editorials Identify Concerns Related To Limerick Nuclear Plant Emergency Planning and Evacuation  http://www.pottsmec.com

“Population Soars Near Limerick Plant”  Big population spike causes headache for any emergency plans.  6-27-11

“Casey Not Sure 10-Mile Evacuation Zone Around Nuclear Plants Is Enough”

License Review Should Consider Evacuation Plan”  7-3-11

“…I’m Not Saying It Doesn’t Look Absurd, But Have You Looked At The Evacuation Plan?” Cartoon 

“Casey Urges Immediate Review of Nuclear Evacuation Zones”  3-12

Nuke Plan Evacuation Plans Need to be Realistic”  Editorial 3-20-12

Limerick Nuke Evacuation Plans Need An Update”   3-20-12

GAO Examines Limerick Nuke Plant’s Evacuation Plan, In Response to Senator Bob Casey’s Request for a Study of Evacuation Plans”  Limerick is 1 of only 4 of the nation’s nuclear plants profiled examining disaster evacuation plans.   7-18-12

Limerick Nuclear Evacuation Study Must Eye Growth” Editorial 7-26-12

The long list of those concerned validates risks and cause for action.

ACE Calls On All Citizens and Elected Officials To Speak Out For Immediate Notification And Expanded Evacuation and Ingestion Pathway Zones.

ACE Video Blog 1 on Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Flawed and Inadequate Emergency and Evacuation Plans

 

 ACE Report Blog Series

Alliance For A Clean Environment  www.acereport.org

Minimizing Chaos and Reducing Radiation Exposure By Improving Limerick

Nuclear Plant’s Fatally Flawed And Inadequate Emergency and Evacuation Plans.

 

Part #1    January 2013

In 2012, NRC Pared Down Emergency and Evacuation Plans

Problem:  After Documented Evidence Of Widespread Radiation Harms From Fukushima, In 2012, NRC Negligently Pared Down Emergency and Evacuation Plans For Limerick and Other Nuclear Plants.

Widespread Radiation Contamination Far Beyond The Evacuation Zone And Devastating Consequences In Japan Make It Clear That Limerick’s Current Evacuation Zone Must Be Expanded and Emergency Plans Must Be Improved, NOT Pared Down.

During Fukushima 2011 meltdowns, NRC called for a 50-mile evacuation zone for U.S. citizens in Japan.  ACE immediately urged NRC to expand Limerick Nuclear Plant’s evacuation zone from 10 miles to 50 miles to better protect people living in our region.

NRC overhauled community emergency planning for the first time in more than three decades, however NRC pared down emergency rules and evacuation plans, further jeopardizing the public and baffling many emergency responders and citizens across the nation.

Instead Of Attempting To Minimize Chaos And Reduce Radiation Exposure Through Better Emergency Planning and Drills For A Radioactive Accident / Meltdown:

1)       NRC Deceived The Public

2)       NRC Denied Radiation Risks and Harms

3)       NRC Weakened Emergency Rules

4)       NRC Failed To Expand Emergency Zones

NRC’s New Rules Make No Sense.  Despite Devastating Lessons After Chernobyl and Fukushima: 

1)       NRC Requires FEWER Exercises for Major Radiation Accidents

2)       NRC Recommends FEWER People Evacuate Right Away

3)       NRC Allows Emergency Drills To Be Run Without Practicing for Radiation Releases

Many responders view NRC’s new rules as downright bizarre.

NRC Attempted To Hide New Pared Down Emergency Plans and Drills  From The Public. 

1)       NRC Announced Revisions December 23, 2011, at the Peak of the Holiday Season.

2)       NRC and FEMA 12/11 and 1/12 Web Archives show NO news releases on evacuation plan changes, so most people were unaware safeguards have been minimized and eliminated.

3)       May 2012, the public had the first full disclosure on NRC’s Pared Down Emergency Rules, through an Associated Press Investigative Report by Jeff Donn, titled, Evacuation Plans, Emergency Drills Pared Down Near Nuke Plants”  (In Mercury 5/20/12 –  http://www.pottsmerc.com)

NRC went to extraordinary lengths to deceive the public about radiation exposure revealing just how little NRC cares about people like us who live in the region of a nuclear power plant.   News Articles Also Reveal That NRC:

1)       Failed to Pursue Emergency Planning Related to Decision-Making, Radiation Monitoring, and Public Education.

2)       Failed to Address Prolonged Station Blackout Conditions.

3)       Failed to Address A Multi-Unit Event, Such As Simultaneous Meltdowns In Limerick’s Two Reactors and Two Fuel Pools.

4)       Preparedness Focus Should Have Shifted To Dealing With Meltdowns Along With Natural and Severe Weather Events, Such As Earthquakes.

 

Why Did NRC Make New Emergency / Evacuation Rules Less Protective?

ü  NRC is valuing Exelon’s profits over public health and safety.   

From The Beginning, (In 1980), PECO, Limerick’s Original Owner, Attempted To Avoid Costs Associated With Evacuation Plans For Limerick Nuclear Plant

1980 Mercury News Article Reported – May 28, 1980

LIMERICK HEARINGS – PE Official Said,  EVACUATION PLAN IS UNNECESSARY”  

 NRC has long been aware original evacuation plans were deficient. 

August 3, 1983, GAO said, Nuclear Evacuation Plans Are Deficient” 

 Collusion in Japan reveals that  values which place money before life and health can lead to unnecessary and devastating consequences.  

ü  A 7-12 independent report said the Fukushima disaster was man-made and caused largely as a result of collusive efforts by the government, regulators and TEPCO to avoid developing and implementing basic safety requirements.

ü  It said failure to implement adequate measures to protect against nuclear accidents and poor planning by governments led to confusion over evacuation.  

For more evidence of NRC’s Negligent Decisions, see list of news articles on NRC.

New Pared-Down NRC Nuclear Rules For Evacuation Are Neither Protective Nor Acceptable.  We Must Work to Change Them BEFORE Meltdowns Happens At Limerick Nuclear Plant. 

  1. To Reduce Radiation Exposure, Fukushima Shows Us Immediate Notification Is Imperative, Limerick’s Evacuation Zone Should Be Expanded From 10 to 50 Miles, and the Ingestion Pathway Zone Expanded From 50 to 100 Miles. 
  2. ACE Is Starting A Campaign For Citizens and Elected Officials To Join Forces Now To Demand Better Protection For Millions In The Greater Philadelphia Region.   An ACE You-Tube and Blog Series Will Summarize Issues and Actions Needed.

 

 

 

 

Look For ACE Report Video-Blog Series Starting in 2013

Starting in January 2013, ACE will begin a Video-Blog Series addressing the need to improve and update Limerick Nuclear Plant’s outdated, flawed, and inadequate emergency and evacuation plans. Each 15 minute video will be uploaded to YouTube, and also be included with an accompanying Blog Post with detailed information on our website. An overview of the series follows.

ACE REPORT VIDEO-BLOG SERIES:
Minimizing Chaos and Reducing Radiation Exposure By Improving Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Fatally Flawed And Inadequate Emergency and Evacuation Plans.

This ACE Report Video and Blog Series Should Serve As A Wake-Up Call To Millions In The Greater Philadelphia Region Related To Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Negligent Emergency and Evacuation Planning.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Limerick Nuclear Plant’s regulator, is required to protect our health and safety, but a body of evidence shows that NRC is instead protecting the financial bottom line of Exelon. NRC’s deceitful claims and actions demonstrate that NRC is failing to fulfill their required duties to protect us.

NRC’s historical and current failures and corruption in policies and decision making are compromising and further jeopardizing millions of people whose lives could be harmed or ruined permanently as the result of a Limerick Nuclear Plant Radioactive Accident and/or Meltdown.

This series of ACE Report Videos and Blogs will identify problems and flaws with Limerick’s Emergency and Evacuation plans. It will reveal why we and our elected officials must demand a system for immediate independent public notification of a Limerick accidental radioactive release, and demand updated and improved planning for expanded evacuation and ingestion pathway zones.

The Alliance For A Clean Environment www.acereport.org
January to March – 2013

Video / Blog Part 1
In 2012, NRC Pared Down Emergency and Evacuation Plans, Even After Fukushima

Video / Blog Part 2
Calls For Immediate Notification And Expanded Evacuation and Ingestion Pathway Zones

Video / Blog Part 3
The Truth and Consequences of Radiation Exposure From Nuclear Plant Accidents / Meltdowns

Video / Blog Part 4
What Really Happened After Fukushima, Chernobyl, and TMI Meltdowns

Video / Blog Part 5
Financial Injustice To The Public From A Radiation Accident / Meltdown

Video / Blog Parts 6 and 7
Fatal Flaws In Emergency – Evacuation Plans for Limerick Nuclear Power Plant

Video / Blog Part 8
Regional Campaign To Improve Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Evacuation Plan, Including Immediate Public Notification and Expanded Evacuation And Ingestion Pathway Zones

Contact Information for Elected Officials

CONTACT ELECTED OFFICIALS TODAY!

To Protect Our Water and Health
Before October 27, 2012
Elected Officials Must Tell DEP And DRBC
To Make Changes To Limerick Nuclear Plant’s
DRAFT Permits For Water Use and Pollution

Current DRAFT Permits Will Increase Unprecedented Threats and Harms To Water Resources Across Parts of Six PA Counties, from Schuylkill to Philadelphia.
­ Now is the time elected officials must speak up to protect their constituents’ rights to safe water and a healthier future.
­ Remind Elected Officials Limerick Operations Have Major Harmful Impacts on Water and Health for Almost Two Million People Pottstown to Philadelphia
­ Those who remain in denial and refuse to speak up to protect our water and health are clearly not on our side. They are protecting Exelon’s profits.

Ask elected officials to tell DEP and DRBC they support changes recommended by ACE for Limerick Nuclear Plant’s DRAFT water permits.
­ See list of changes below. MOST IMPORTANT! Exelon must filter Limerick Nuclear Plant’s radioactive discharges and mine pit water pumping into the Schuylkill River, or Limerick Nuclear Plant’s water use and pollution permits should be revoked and Limerick should close.
­ See ACE Report on The PCTV Network website: www.thepctvnetwork.com

http://pctvnetwork.yolasite.com/the-ace-report.php

Governor Tom Corbett (R)
225 Main Capitol Building
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120
Phone: (717) 787-2500 Fax: (717) 772-8284
governor@state.pa.us

Tom Corbett has the greatest responsibility in the outcome of Limerick’s permits. Corbett is a major player in DRBC hierarchy and appoints the head of the PA DEP, who determines DEP’s policy. Corbett appointed a former Exelon attorney to head up PA DEP. This is a clear conflict of interest that can have long-term harmful impacts on our water and health. Tell Corbett to protect us, not Exelon’s profits.

PA Senator John Rafferty (R) – Montgomery County
Montgomery County Office
3818 Germantown Pike, Suite B
Collegeville, PA 19426
Ph: 610-831-8830 FAX: 610-831-8837
jrafferty@pasen.gov

PA Senator Andrew E. Dinniman (D)– Chester County
One North Church Street
West Chester, PA 19380
(610) 692-2112 Fax (610) 436-1721
andydinniman@pasenate.com

PA Representative Tom Quigley (R)
963 E. High Street
Pottstown, PA 19464
Phone (610) 326-9563 Fax (610) 718-5787
Tquigley@pahousegop.com

PA Representative Tim Hennessey (R)
Old Elverson Train Station
P.O. Box 255
Elverson, PA 19520
Phone: 610-286-9194 Fax: 610-286-1922
thenness@pahousegop.com

PA Representative Mike Vereb (R)
3950 Germantown Pike
Suite 101
Collegeville, PA 19426
Phone: (610) 409-2615 Fax: (610) 409-2619
mvereb@pahousegop.com

U. S. Congressman James Gerlach (R)
580 Main Street, Suite 4
Trappe, PA 19246
Phone (610) 409-2780 Fax (610) 409-7988
scott.savett@mail.house.gov

U.S. Congressman Charles W. Dent (R) PA-15
701 W. Broad Street, Suite 200
Bethlehem, PA 18018
Phone (610) 861-9734 Fax (610) 861-9308
vincent.odomski@mail.house.gov

U.S. Senator Bob Casey (D)
2000 Market Street, Suite 1870
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: (215) 405-9660 Fax: (215) 405-9669
senator@casey.senate.gov

U.S. Senator Pat Toomey (R)
8 Penn Center
1628 John F. Kennedy Blvd. Suite 1702
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Phone: (215) 241-1090 Fax: (215) 241-1095
Raisa_Griffith@toomey.senate.gov

Recently Contacted By ACE On Specific Berks and Schuylkill County water threats:

PA Senator Judith Schwank (D) Berks County
1940 North 13th Street
Suite 232
Reading, PA 19604
(610) 929-2151 FAX: (610) 929-2576
Jschwank@pasenate.com

PA Senator David G. Argall (R) Schuylkill County
One West Centre Street
Mahanoy City, PA 17948
(570) 773-0891
Dargall@pasen.gov

Other officials:

PA Representative Curt Schroder (R)
315 Gordon Drive
Exton, PA, 19341
Phone: (610) 524-5595 Fax: (610) 524-5667

U.S. Congressman Pat Meehan (R)
940 Sproul Road
Springfield, PA 19064
Phone: (610) 690-7323 Fax: (610) 690-7329
Jourdan.Frain@mail.house.gov

U. S. Congresswoman Allyson Schwartz (D) PA-13
Montgomery County Office
706 West Avenue
Jenkintown, PA 19046
phone–215/517-6572 Fax: (215) 517-6575
Mark.Castillo1@mail.house.gov

Local Municipalities Are Most Impacted
Local Elected Officials Should Also Be Contacted To Speak Up to Protect the Water and Health of Their Constituents, Especially Those Getting Water From the Schuylkill River.
 It’s Time To Value Our Water and Health More Than Exelon’s Contributions That Pale By Comparison To Public Costs for Consequences of Limerick’s Operations.

Most Important Local Officials To Contact
(If You Cannot Find Contact Information E-mail ACE)
Pottstown
West and Upper Pottsgroves
Lower Pottsgrove
North Coventry
East Coventry
Royersford
Spring City
East Vincent
Phoenixville
Collegeville
Perkiomenville
Upper Providence
Norristown
All Other Municipalities Down to and including Philadelphia

DEP and DRBC Will Accept Written Comments
On Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Water Use And Discharges

DEADLINE – OCTOBER 27, 2012 5:00 P.M.

IT’S OUR RIVER AND DRINKING WATER
LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD!
Both agencies are reducing Exelon’s accountability for Limerick Nuclear Plant’s pollution discharges, the worst threat to the Schuylkill River.

These permits look like they were written by Exelon with loopholes, exemptions, elimination of long-standing restrictions, and even less regulation.

Despite evidence of unprecedented threats and harm, these permits fail to reduce risks. Neither permit can, or will, protect vital public water resources and public health. Changes must be made.

SEND YOUR COMMENTS TO:

#1 PA DEP – DRAFT NPDES PERMIT NO: PA0051926

PA DEP
Attention Jenifer Fields
Southeast Regional Office, Water Management,
2 E. Main Street, Norristown, PA 19401
Fax to (484) 250-5971 Via Email to jefields@pa.gov

Changes Needed to DEP’s DRAFT NPDES Permit No. PA0051926 Include:

1. Remove the EXEMPTION for Total Dissolved Solids from Outfall 001, which transport radiation and cooling tower toxics into the river

2. Instead of EXEMPTION from Clean Water Laws, require Exelon to FILTER TDS from Outfall 001 with reverse osmosis or CLOSE Limerick

3. Require strict enforcement and meaningful penalties for all Safe Drinking Water violations

4. Require independent, comprehensive testing

5. Require Exelon to maintain all records permanently, not just 3 years.

6. Require IMMEDIATE PUBLIC NOTIFICATION of radioactive spills

#2 DRBC – DRAFT Docket No. D-1969-210 CP-13

DRBC
P.O. Box 7360
Attention: DRBC Secretary
West Trenton, NJ 08628-0360
Fax To (609) 883-9522 Via email to Paula.Schmitt@drbc.state.nj.us

Changes Needed To DRBC’s DRAFT Docket D-1969-210 CP-13 Include:

1. Eliminate unrestricted use, or ‘eminent domain’, of our water for Limerick

2. Do NOT allow 2 million gallons more PER DAY for Limerick’s cooling towers

3. Stop mine water pumping Into the Schuylkill, OR require Exelon to filter

4. Require Limerick to shut down when river temperatures exceed the 87 degree limit

5. Require unannounced independent testing for flow, temperature, and all discharges

6. Require public notice and input for all future Exelon requested water use for Limerick

7. Require an independent mediator, NOT the DRBC Director, to hear and adjudicate all water related claims against Limerick and Exelon

Tell DRBC to Protect Water Resources in Parts of Six Counties! Sample Letter to Send to DRBC

Commission Secretary
Delaware River Basin Commission
P.O. Box 7360
West Trenton, NJ 08628-0360

Fax (609) 883-9522
Paula.Schmitt@drbc.state.nj.us

Subject: Public Comment On Exelon’s Limerick Nuclear Plant Docket

Having enough clean, safe water is vital to our lives. If Limerick Nuclear Plant operations dry up our groundwater or surface water resources, or our water becomes so radioactive it can’t be used safely, our homes become worthless and our businesses cannot remain viable.

The Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC) DRAFT Docket for Limerick Nuclear Plant’s water use jeopardizes water resources in parts of six counties, just for the operations of one business, Limerick Nuclear Plant.

Most at risk are the almost two million people from Pottstown to Philadelphia who rely on the Schuylkill River for their water supply. With so much at stake for so many people, DRBC’s decisions clearly protect Exelon’s profits, not the public’s water.

DRBC’s 5-year docket jeopardizes public water resources with loopholes, exemptions, elimination of long-standing restrictions, and even less regulation. Despite evidence of unprecedented threats and harms, this DRAFT Docket will result in less protection for vital public water resources and health.

To Protect Vital Public Water Resources, Changes Needed To DRBC’s DRAFT Docket:

1. DO NOT APPROVE INCREASED WATER WITHDRAWALS For Limerick Nuclear Power Plant From Any Source. Public Water Resources Must Be Protected For All Other Users. DRBC should not allow Exelon to use any more water for Limerick Nuclear Plant operations at a time when we face increasing drought conditions and record heat waves.

REMOVE APPROVAL FOR INCREASED WATER WITHDRAWALS For Limerick Nuclear Plant
• 2 Million Gallons Per Day Increase From The Schuylkill River
INCREASE PLANNED 56.2 to 58.2 Million Gallons Per Day for Limerick Nuclear
Consider Schuylkill River Water Withdrawal Comparisons:
Pottstown 5 Million Gallons Per Day for 30,000 People
Norristown 17 Million Gallons Per Day for about 87,000 People
• 4.2 Million Gallon Increase As Needed – Perkiomen Creek via the Delaware River
• 7.2 Million Gallons Per Day Increase – Tamaqua’s Still Creek / Owl Creek Reservoirs
From 36 to 43.3 Million Gallons Per Day
• 446.4 Million Gallons Per Month – Unfiltered, Contaminated Wadesville Mine Pool Water
Into The Schuylkill At 10,000 Gallons Per Minute – Could Total Almost 4 Billion Gallons Per Year.

2. Stop toxic mine water pumping Into the Schuylkill, OR require Exelon to filter
Do not approve continued mine water pumping into the river unless Exelon agrees to filter the water. Pumping of almost ½ billion gallons per month of toxic unfiltered mine water into a drinking water source is unacceptable for water and health. Manganese is permitted at 80 times Safe Drinking Water Standards, and Iron 20 time Safe Drinking Water Standards.

3. Do not approve Limerick Nuclear Plant’s 5-year docket with no limit for Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) discharges from Limerick. To protect water and health, the docket must include the requirement for Exelon to filter TDS pollution from Limerick’s most dangerous discharge into the river – Outfall 001. Limerick Nuclear Plant cannot meet DRBC’s 1,000 mg/L discharge limit for the discharge pipe carrying radiation and cooling tower toxics into the river. This is cause to require filtration, not approve a docket that removes the limit. Public water companies do not and should not be expected to filter out all Limerick’s radionuclides and other toxics discharged into the Schuylkill River. The public should not have to pay more for their water.

4. Require Limerick to shut down when river temperatures exceed the 87 degree limit.
Since 1985, Limerick Nuclear Plant has overheated the Schuylkill River with over 5 billion gallons per year of discharges up to 110 degrees. Exelon’s testing at Royersford, just 2 miles downstream from Limerick’s discharges, proves the river is repeatedly exceeding 87 degrees.
 When the Schuylkill River 87 degree heat limit is exceeded at Royersford, DRBC must require Limerick to close, to stop Limerick’s heated discharges.

5. Require unannounced independent testing for flow, temperature, and all discharges.
Exelon’s track record here and elsewhere shows we can’t trust Exelon to provide full, accurate, and timely disclosure. Exelon controls all of the monitoring, calculating, testing, and reporting for Limerick. See www.acereport.org – Section 20 “Why We Can’t Trust Exelon”. This is about unprecedented threats to public water and health from Limerick Nuclear Plant. Independent data is imperative.
 DRBC collects millions in payments each year for our water, from Exelon for Limerick’s withdrawal from and discharges into the Schuylkill River. That money should be used for independent testing in all categories.

6. Eliminate unrestricted use, or ‘eminent domain’, of our water for Limerick Nuclear Plant. DRBC’s Docket gives Limerick Nuclear Plant unrestricted access to all water resources during a Limerick Nuclear emergency or meltdown, until it has been stabilized, regardless of the potential to render dry or otherwise unusable any well or surface water supply which is substantially adversely affected due to Limerick withdrawal.
 Limerick is required to have a 30 day water supply for emergencies. There is only enough water on-site for 48 hours and that includes cooling tower water. It is unacceptable for so many people to face such threats to their water supply. The potential for Limerick accidents or a meltdown is increasing. It is not acceptable to jeopardize the water supplies across six counties when there are far safer energy alternatives that won’t jeopardize our water supplies.

7. Require an independent mediator, NOT the DRBC Director, to hear and adjudicate all
water related claims against Limerick and Exelon In essence, the DRBC Director would have unilateral authority to recognize or reject any related water claims against Exelon and Limerick Nuclear Plant. DRBC’s Executive Director, could make a “Final Determination” regarding the validity of a complaint against Exelon, scope or sufficiency of such investigations, and the extent of appropriate mitigation measures required. DRBC’s executive director should not have authority to determine whether Exelon should be held accountable for repair, replacement, or extent of mitigation measures for dry or otherwise unusable wells or surface water supplies adversely affected. Victims without safe, usable water should not be forced to pay for the investigation and/or mitigation plan prepared by a hydrologist to be submitted to DRBC’s Executive Director.
 DRBC has been biased in docket decisions related to Limerick Nuclear Plant, and has repeatedly made decisions biased toward Exelon’s profits, not public water and public health.

8. Require public notice and input for all future Exelon requested water use for Limerick.
The public needs and deserves an opportunity to understand and comment on their water resources.

Please send written responses to each issue identified in my comments.

Sincerely,

Tell DEP to Protect Our Water! Sample Letter to Send to DEP

Jennifer Fields, Clean Water Management Program Manager
PA Department of Environmental Protection
2 E. Main Street
Norristown, PA 19401
Jefields@pa.gov

RE: Limerick Nuclear Plant’s NPDES Permit No. PA0051926

Dear Ms. Fields,

DEP’s mission is to protect public water and public health. We have a right to clean water under Clean Water Laws, which DEP should be enforcing. DEP’s NPDES permits are permits to pollute our water.

Limerick Nuclear Plant’s discharges (5 billion gallons per year), are by far the worst threat to the Schuylkill River and public health because they include a broad range of radionuclides, some with very long half-lives.

Loopholes and exemptions in Limerick Nuclear Plant’s DRAFT NPDES permit ignore Limerick’s most dangerous discharges into the Schuylkill River, a vital water resource for almost two million people from Pottstown to Philadelphia. Harmful impacts from Limerick Nuclear Plant’s discharges on our water and health do not disappear because DEP allows permit loopholes and exemptions.

To protect Schuylkill River water and health of almost two million people, I urge DEP to make the following changes to the DRAFT NPDES permit for Limerick Nuclear Plant:

Changes Needed to DEP’s DRAFT NPDES Permit Include:

1. Remove the permit EXEMPTION for Total Dissolved Solids from Outfall 001

Justification:
• Outfall 001 TDS transports radiation and cooling tower toxics, Limerick’s most dangerous pollution into the Schuylkill River.
• The Safe Drinking Water TDS limit is 500 mg/L. DEP and Exelon both admitted Limerick can’t meet Limerick’s previous limit of 1000 mg/L. Previous discharges were up to over 2,400 mg/L. Exempting this harmful pollution because Limerick can’t meet the limit is negligent.
• With NO TDS permit limit, Limerick circumvents enforcement of Safe Drinking Water standards under Clean Water Laws, while continuing to seriously jeopardize water and health.

2. Require Exelon to FILTER TDS from Outfall 001 with reverse osmosis or CLOSE Limerick.

Justification:
• Limerick routinely discharges a broad range of radionuclides, including Iodine-131, Cesium-137, and Strontium-90, into the Schuylkill River with TDS discharges. There is no safe level of exposure according the National Academy of Sciences. Added, cumulative, and synergistic impacts while unknown, are obviously significant.
• DEP can reduce Limerick’s radioactive discharges by requiring TDS filtration. While filtration could be expensive for Exelon, radioactive contamination of vital water supplies could be far more costly to the public.

3. Conduct independent, comprehensive monitoring

Justification:
• All monitoring, testing, and reporting are controlled by Exelon, a company that has repeatedly proven here and elsewhere, that it can’t be trusted to provide full, accurate, and timely disclosure.
• DEP’s monitoring requirements for Limerick Nuclear Plant are woefully inadequate. For example:
 2 times a month for Outfall 001 and NOT for radiation and some cooling tower toxics in TDS,
 1 time a year for all other 23 discharges, directly and indirectly, into the Schuylkill River.
• If DEP doesn’t have the funding for meaningful oversight, Limerick should close.

4. Require Exelon to maintain all records permanently, not just 3 years.

Justification:
• Records should be put into electronic files with back-up CDs that should be maintained until the completion of decommissioning.

5. Require IMMEDIATE PUBLIC NOTIFICATION of radioactive spills

Justification:
• Unless the public is notified immediately, people are not given an opportunity to avoid exposure to accidentally increased radioactive exposure.
• The public was not notified until 23 days after Limerick’s 3-19-12 radioactive “spill”. Public health was jeopardized. Notification needs to be immediate, not just to DEP, but also for the public.

Please provide detailed responses to each of my specific requests for changes which would result in reduced threats to public water and health, related to Limerick Nuclear Plant’s NPDES permit.

Sincerely,

Action Alert! Attend PA DEP/DRBC Public Hearing on Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Permits to Use and Pollute Water 8-28-12r

ACTION ALERT!

ATTEND IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEARING ON LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT’S WATER PERMITS FOR USE AND ABUSE OF OUR VITAL WATER SUPPLIES 8-28-12

IT’S OUR WATER!
Don’t Let Exelon Get Away With, In Essence, “Eminent Domain”, of Our Water Resources In Parts of Six Counties For Limerick Nuclear Plant Operations and Exelon Profits.

GET THE FACTS. LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD!
Let DEP And DRBC Know How You Feel About Exelon Using And Abusing Our Water For Profit At Limerick Nuclear Plant, While We Risk Having No Water or Water Too Radioactive To Use Safely!

WE NEED SAFE WATER! WE DON’T NEED LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT!
Limerick’s electric goes to the grid, supplying only ½ of 1% of our nation’s energy. It’s sold across several states, but we face unprecedented use and abuse of our water. Safer energy alternatives are ready now, that won’t threaten our water supply.

SPEAK OUT OR LET YOUR PRESENCE BE YOUR VOICE!

TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2012, 6:00 to 9:00 P.M.
Sunnybrook Ballroom in Pottstown

PERMIT CHANGES MUST BE MADE TO PROTECT OUR WATER.
Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Unprecedented Private Use and Abuse of Our Waters Could Get Worse.
 SAY NO to Limerick’s dangerous discharges into the Schuylkill River, which include radiation and cooling tower toxics with NO LIMITS.
 SAY NO to increased use of our water from many sources and unrestricted use in the event of an accident or meltdown of all sources, including Schuylkill and Delaware Rivers, groundwater, and others.
 SAY NO, in essence, to a DRBC CZAR, who would unilaterally decide whether Exelon is required to compensate you for damages if Limerick renders your well or surface water dry or otherwise unusable from radiation.

LIST OF WHAT IS NEEDED BELOW

PA DEP NPDES Permit And DRBC Docket
DEMAND Changes Below To:
PA DEP DRAFT NPDES PERMIT – NO: PA0051926

Urge PA Elected Officials To Ask DEP and Governor Corbett To:
1. Remove Exemption For Radiation And Cooling Toxics In TDS Pollution Discharges
2. Require Strict Enforcement And Meaningful Penalties For Violations Of Clean Water Act Standards
3. Require Independent Comprehensive Testing
4. Require Immediate Notification Of Radioactive Spills
5. Require Exelon To Maintain All Records Permanently, Not Just 3 Years
6. Require Exelon To Filter Or Close Limerick
7. Require Reverse Osmosis Filtration For TDS, With Frequent Filter Changes To Protect The River and Public Health

DEMAND Changes Below To:
DRBC DRAFT DOCKET – NO. D-1969-210 cp-13

Urge PA Elected Officials To Ask DRBC and Governor Corbett To:
1. NOT Allow Increased Water Use for Limerick Nuclear Plant
2. Stop Mine Water Pumping for Limerick Operations or Require Exelon to Filter
3. NOT Issue Limerick’s Docket Without TDS Limits For Outfall 001
4. Require Limerick to Reduce Operations or Shut Down When River Temperatures Exceed 87 Degree Limit
5. Require Unannounced Independent Testing for Low Flow Limits, Temperature Restrictions, and All Radiation and Toxic Chemicals
6. Require Public Notice and Input For All Future Limerick Nuclear Plant Water Use
7. Require An Independent Mediator to Hear and Adjudicate All Water Related Claims Against Limerick and Exelon

DEP and DRBC Will Accept Your Comments On Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Water Use And Discharges
YOUR WRITTEN COMMENTS
DEADLINE – OCTOBER 27, 2012 5:00 P.M.

SEND YOUR COMMENTS TO:

#1 PA DEP – DRAFT NPDES PERMIT NO: PA0051926
PA DEP Attention: Jenifer Fields
Southeast Regional Office, Water Management,
2 E. Main Street, Norristown, PA 19401
Fax to (484) 250-5971 Via Email to jefields@pa.gov

#2 DRBC – DRAFT Docket No. D-1969-210 CP-13
P.O. Box 7360
Attention: DRBC Secretary
West Trenton, NJ 08628-0360
Fax To (609) 883-9522 Via email to Paula.Schmitt@drbc.state.nj.us

CONTACT ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS
Ask Them To Get The Facts and Speak Out NOW To Protect Our Water.
Their Silence and Support Protects Exelon’s Profits, NOT Our Water.

For Details – www.acereport.org
­ Blog Posting: Summary Report “Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Use and Abuse Of Our Water” (August 2012)

­ Homepage Section #6: “Schuylkill River, Limerick’s Operations Threaten Drinking Water Disaster”

­ Homepage Section #20: “Why We Can’t Trust Exelon”

Aside

Summary Report: Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Use and Abuse of Our Water, August 2012

ACE Summary Report – August, 2012
IT’S ABOUT OUR WATER!

Don’t Let Exelon Get Away With, In Essence, “Eminent Domain”, of Our Water Resources In Parts of Six Counties For Limerick Nuclear Plant Operations and Exelon Profits.

LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT IMPACTS WATER ACROSS SIX COUNTIES
Including Schuylkill, Berks, Montgomery, Chester, Bucks, and Philadelphia

Details Summarized In This Report Reveal Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Unprecedented And Unjust Use And Abuse Of Our Water That Are Being Whitewashed And Legalized By Agencies That Supposedly Protect Our Water and Health.

But, DEP’S NPDES PERMIT And DRBC’s DOCKET Are
STILL DRAFTS – THEY’RE NOT A DONE DEAL!

It’s VERY Important For You To Attend The Public Hearing Tuesday, 8-28-12
6:00 To 9:00 P.M. Sunnybrook Ballroom In Pottstown

The Alliance For A Clean Environment (ACE), Investigated Many Pollution Threats To Public Water Over The Past 15 Years. After Review Of Documents And Permits On Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Harms And Threats Since 2006, We Concluded Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Water Use and Discharges Clearly Present The Most Dangerous Threats To Public Water Supplies For The Largest Numbers Of People.

In Essence – To Protect Our Water, Exelon Must Be Required To:
 Filter Out Toxics Which Jeopardize Water And Health
 Comply With Clean Water Standards and Laws – With NO EXEMPTIONS
 Face Revoking Of Limerick’s Permits For Violations Of The Law

Our View:
WE NEED SAFE WATER! WE DON’T NEED LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT!
We Must Have An Ample, Safe Water Supply To Thrive and Survive. Limerick Nuclear Plant Threatens Water Resources In The Many Serious Ways Revealed In This Report. Limerick’s electric goes to the grid, supplying only ½ of 1% of our nation’s energy. It’s sold across several states, but we face unprecedented use and abuse of our water. Safer energy alternatives are ready now, that won’t threaten our water supply.

At The End Of This Report, We Prepared A List Of Suggested Changes That, If Made, Could Reduce Some Of The Serious Risks We Face, For Both DEP’s Permit To Pollute The Schuylkill River and DRBC’s Permit Allowing Limerick to Have “In Essence Eminent Domain” Over Our Water.

We Must OPPOSE One Person, A Biased “DRBC CZAR” Deciding If Exelon Is Held Accountable For Limerick Nuclear Plant Rendering Wells Or Surface Waters Dry Or Otherwise Unusable From Radiation Or Other Toxic Discharges. Victims Would Even Be Forced To Hire A Hydrologist To Present “The Czar” With A Report.

YOU CAN HELP PROTECT OUR WATER!
REVIEW THE FACTS IN THIS REPORT AND SPEAK UP NOW!
1. ATTEND DEP/DRBC PUBLIC HEARING, Tuesday 8-28-12, From 6:00 to 9:00 PM
Parents, Grandparents, All Concerned Citizens – This Is Our Opportunity To Reduce Limerick’s Threats To Our Water.
Please Take Time to Attend. Speak Out Or Let Your Presence Be Your Voice.
2. SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS BY OCTOBER 27, 2012 by 5:00 P.M.
Before Or After The Hearing You Can Submit Written Comments
Addresses Listed On ACE Blog For Public Hearing
Please Copy ACE at either:
aceactivists@comcast.net or 1189 Foxview Road, Pottstown, PA 19465
3. ASK ELECTED OFFICIALS TO SPEAK UP TO PROTECT OUR WATER
Their Silence Protects Exelon Profits, Not Our Water

DETAILS BELOW
REVEAL THAT YOUR WATER IS NOT BEING PROTECTED!

Unprecedented Use and Abuse of Public Water Resources For Profit
• PA DEP and DRBC Will Hold A Joint Public Hearing August 28, 2012 at Sunnybrook in Pottstown
• DEP and DRBC Went To Extraordinary Lengths To Avoid Enforcement of Limits and Law
• Problem: Limerick Nuclear Plant Can’t Meet The Clean Water Law Without Filtration, But Instead of Requiring Filtration, DEP and DRBC Plan to Issue Permits With NO LIMITS. Eliminating Limits Protects Exelon’s Profits, But Jeopardizes The Health Of Almost Two Million People From Pottstown to Philadelphia, Who Depend On The Schuylkill River For Their Water.
• PA DEP Draft Permit – To Be Issued By April 2013 For 5 Years – Most Alarming Issues:
­ Radiation and Cooling Tower Toxics In TDS Discharges From Outfall 001 Would Be Allowed To Be Discharged Into The Schuylkill River With No Limits, Even Though The Schuylkill River Is a Drinking Water Source For Almost Two Million People From Pottstown to Philadelphia.
­ Both DEP and Exelon Admit Limerick Can’t Meet Safe Drinking Water Standards.
­ Limerick’s TDS Discharges Drastically Exceeded DRBC Limits – (2010 Data- Nearly 5 Times Higher Than Safe Standards).
­ DEP Exempted Discharge 001 Instead Of Requiring Filtration To Protect Public Health
• DRBC Draft Docket (Permit) – To Be Issued April, 2013 – Most Alarming Issues:
­ In Essence, DRBC’s Docket Would Give Limerick Nuclear Plant “Eminent Domain” Over Our Vital Water Resources
­ In Essence, DRBC’s Docket Would Eliminate Future Public Participation
­ More Water Would Be Allocated To Limerick Nuclear Plant From Many Sources
­ The Schuylkill River Would Basically Be Dedicated To Limerick Nuclear Plant
­ For An Accident or Meltdown, Limerick Would Have Unrestricted Water Use From All Sources, For An Unlimited Amount Of Time
­ DRBC’s Director Would Unilaterally Decide All Claims Against Exelon For Water Loss Or Contamination
­ Victims Would Be Forced To Pay For A Hydrologist Study To Present To The DRBC Director For Claims Against Exelon

DEP and DRBC DRAFT Permits Protect Exelon’s Profits, NOT Our Water
• Permit Approvals Could Lead To A Drinking Water Disaster, Especially In The Schuylkill River, Which Is A Vital Water Source For Almost 2 Million People and Businesses from Pottstown to Philadelphia.
• DEP and DRBC Are NOT Objective. Before Limerick Started Operating, These Agencies Gave Approvals Allowing Limerick To Start Operating, Knowing The Schuylkill River Could Not Sustain The Insatiable Water Needs Of Limerick’s Cooling Towers.
• Current DRAFT Permits Continue To Ignore Limerick’s Unprecedented Threats and Harms To Our Water.
• Both Agencies Plan To Issue Permits Knowing Limerick’s Dangerous TDS Discharges Can’t Meet Safe Drinking Water Limits Into The Schuylkill River, A Vital Drinking Water Source For Almost 2 Million People.
• DRBC’s Permit Jeopardizes The Water Supply Across 6 Counties and S.R. Water Quality.
• DEP’s NPDES Permit Is A Permit To Pollute The Schuylkill River:
­ With Radiation and Other Cooling Tower Toxics – With No Limits
­ With Woefully Inadequate Monitoring, Testing, and Reporting Which Are All Controlled By Exelon, A Company We Can’t Trust To Provide Full and Accurate Disclosure
­ With NO Independent Testing Of Limerick’s Most Dangerous Discharges Or Actual Oversight
• To Enforce The Law To Protect Our Water, Both DEP and DRBC Should Refuse To Issue Permits Until Exelon Agrees To FILTER Limerick’s Intake and Discharges, As Well As Wadesville Mine Water Discharges.
• Exelon Should Filter or Close Limerick Nuclear Power Plant.
• If The Public Doesn’t Speak Out, These Agencies Will Continue to Protect Exelon Profits At The Expense Of Our Water.

DRBC Was Negligent From The Beginning
• Limerick Nuclear Plant Should NOT Have Been Built Along The Schuylkill River. There’s Never Been Enough Water In The Schuylkill River, To Sustain The Insatiable Water Needs Of Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Cooling Towers.
• DRBC Approved Limerick Nuclear Plant’s 1st Docket in the 1980s, Allowing Limerick To Start Operating, Knowing There Wasn’t enough water in the Schuylkill River.
• Proof: DRBC’s requirement for Exelon to spend the money to transport water from the Delaware River by way of the Perkiomen Creek.
• Problem: DRBC failed to do the math showing billions of gallons of water MORE EACH YEAR would be withdrawn from the Schuylkill River than discharged, even after Delaware River supplementation.
• The Delaware River Provided Only A Fraction Of Water Supplementation Needed To Stop Schuylkill River Depletion Over The Past 27 Years.
• FOIA records show DRBC ignored concerns expressed by many in our region BEFORE Limerick’s water use was approved by DRBC. Concerns included – Limerick Nuclear Plant’s harmful impacts to the Schuylkill River, the public water supply, and public health.
• Concerns were justified. The injustice of Limerick’s long-term consequences on our water supply are magnified now in times of heat waves and drought.

Negligence In Current DEP and DRBC Permitting
• DEP and DRBC Pass The Buck and Allow Exelon To Control All Monitoring, Testing, and Reporting.
• DEP’s NPDES Permit Is A License for Limerick Nuclear Plant To Pollute – Without Limits.
• Exelon Would be Given 30 Months, AFTER The Permit Is Issued (April, 2013), to do studies to determine their own permit limits – It Would Be Like Us Setting Our Own Tax Rates.
• 24 Pipes Go Into The Schuylkill River From The Limerick Nuclear Plant Site, With An Exemption For Total Dissolved Solids,
Which Include Radiation and Cooling Tower Toxics.
• Concerns About Limerick’s Impacts To The Schuylkill River Now Include:
­ Radioactive and Other Dangerous Pollution Discharged Into The River With No Limit
­ Continued Over-Heating of the River
­ Drought Conditions Concentrating Radiation and Other Toxics Discharged Into The River
­ Cooling Tower Depletion Raising Worries About Dangerously Low River Flows or Even Drying Up
• It goes from Bad to Worse. Nearly 2 Million People Depend On The Schuylkill River for Their Water. There Will Be Less and
Less Usable Water As Populations Increase.
• There Is No Enforcement Power If DEP Passes the Responsibility for TDS Limits To DRBC.
• There Will Be No Future Input On Limerick’s Water Use And Discharges – DRBC’s Director Would Be The River Czar
• Public Officials Need To Speak Out – They’ve Been Negligent So Far – They Need To Get To The Hearing And Speak Out To
Protect the Public’s Water

WATER INCREASES For Limerick Nuclear Plant In DRBC’s Draft Docket – A Threat To Water Supplies Across 6 Counties.

Schuylkill River – Further Jeopardized By DRBC DRAFT Docket

­ INCREASE – 2 MILLION GALLONS MORE WITHDRAWN PER DAY (DRBC Docket)
Currently Limerick Nuclear Plant Withdraws 56.2 Million Gallons Per Day
Limerick Already Withdraws More Than 2 1/2 Times More Than The Total Withdrawn For All Pottstown and Norristown Customers Combined.
­ Pottstown Withdraws 5 Million Gallons Per Day – For 30,000 Customers
­ Norristown Withdraws 17 Million Gallons Per Day – For 87,000 Customers

­ INCREASE – COOLING TOWER USE – 2 MILLION GALLONS MORE PER DAY.
How Can We Afford 2 Million Gallons More Cooling Tower Steam Each Day Knowing It Contains Toxic Chemicals and Dangerous Particulate Matter PM-10
­ DRBC Docket Plans To Allow From 42 to 44 Million Gallons Per Day

 SCHUYLKILL RIVER DEPLETION – LIMERICK’S ROLE IS UNDENIABLE Limerick’s Cooling Towers Depleted Schuylkill River Flows By Billions of Gallons Each Year For Decades, Since 1985.
­ After 27 Years Of Operation, Limerick’s Drastic Water Withdrawals From The Schuylkill River and Cooling Tower Water Use Have Obviously Played A Major Role In Significant Depletion Of The Schuylkill River and Its Tributaries.
­ Limerick Likely Withdrew Over 20 Billion Gallons Of Schuylkill River Water EACH Year, And Only Returned 5 Billion Gallons (Heated and Radioactive).
­ It Would Have Taken 15 Billion Gallons Of Supplementation From Other Sources Each Year Since The Late 1980s To Prevent Depletion. That Didn’t Happen. In Fact, ACE Found No Proof That More Than 3 Billion Gallons Were Supplemented In Any Year.
Residents Who Use The Schuylkill River For Recreation Started Expressing Concern To ACE Over EXTREMELY Low Schuylkill River Flows In 2006.
­ Where They Once Needed A Boat To Cross, They Now Could Walk Across The River. The Manatawny Creek Became Nearly Dried Up. Other Tributaries Are Very Low.
­ Residents’ Concerns About Low Flows Started ACE’s Investigation Into Limerick’s Water Use.
­ DEP’s Own 1999 Booklet, “Water Is Life”, Expressed Concern About What DEP Called “RECORD LOW FLOWS” In the Schuylkill River.
­ DEP’s Contradiction Is Puzzling. While DEP Admitted In 1999 That The Schuylkill River Had Reached Record Low Flows, DEP Is Now Claiming There Is NO Difference In Flows Since Limerick Started Operating.
­ DEP Lost All Credibility In The Community Claiming Flows Didn’t Change.

 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Why Should More Schuylkill River Water Be Dedicated To Limerick Nuclear Plant? Limerick Should Cut Power, NOT Take 2 Million Gallons PER DAY MORE Of A Vital Public Water Resource.
1. The Schuylkill River Is A Vital Water Resource for Almost Two Million People From Pottstown To Philadelphia. Hospitals, Fire Companies, Schools, And Many Other Businesses Also Depend On The Schuylkill River For Water.
2. Public Demands Are Increasing Through Increased Populations and More Contaminated Groundwater Wells, While Water In The River Is Depleting Through Limerick’s Use and Increasing Heat Waves and Droughts.
3. Depletion Concentrates Limerick’s Radioactive And Other Toxic Discharges.

IMPACTS ON OTHER WATER RESOURCES
DRBC DRAFT DOCKET APPROVALS TO OPERATE LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT

Delaware River By Way Of Perkiomen Creek
• INCREASE – From 42 To 46.2 Million Gallons Per Day

Tamaqua’s Still Creek / Owl Creek Reservoirs
• INCREASE – From 36 to 43.3 Million Gallons Per Day

Wadesville Mine Pit Water
Contaminated Pumping Into The Schuylkill River Continued
• 446.4 Million Gallons Per Month Can Be Pumped UNFILTERED
• @ 10,000 Gallons Per Minute

Groundwater In Schuylkill County Around Wadesville Mine At Risk
DRBC’S DOCKET ALLOWS BILLIONS OF GALLONS OF GROUNDWATER TO CONTINUE TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM SCHUYLKILL COUNTY FOR USE AT LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, BY WAY OF THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER.
• Since 2003, To Operate Limerick Nuclear Plant, Exelon Pumped Billions Of Gallons Of Contaminated Wadesville Mine Pit Water Into The Schuylkill River.
• It Was Estimated In 1953, That Wadesville Mine Only Started With 3.6 Billion Gallons.
• Wadesville Mine Pit Water Recharges From Surrounding Groundwater In Schuylkill County.
• Even If Mine Water Pumping Is Done 6 Months A Year, That’s Almost 3 Billion Gallons PER YEAR Of Water Transported From Schuylkill County To Limerick.
How Many Years Can This Drain On Groundwater Around Wadesville Mine Continue Before Area Wells Are Impacted?

Groundwater Around Limerick Nuclear Plant
Limerick’s Groundwater Withdrawals Could Jeopardize Residential Well Water.
• Limerick Nuclear Plant Uses Four Groundwater Wells Located Onsite.
• Total Annual Groundwater Withdrawal Allocation – 73.2 Million Gallons Per Year
• Only A Fraction Is Returned To The Ground.
• WELLS WITHIN 1 MILE From The Center Of The Limerick Nuclear Plant Site:
46 Domestic Withdrawal Wells
13 Residences LESS Than 1 Mile From Reactor Building
3 Homes 1 Mile From Reactor Building
2 Commercial Wells
Exelon Was Advised This Allocation Will Only Continue Until 2019. Then What?
With Increasing Heat And Drought Conditions,
 Can Anyone Prove There Will Be Enough Groundwater For Residents, Other Businesses, And Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Huge Groundwater Withdrawals;
 Even Until 2019?
 Until 2029, When Limerick’s Current License Expires?
 Until 2049, If Limerick’s License Is Renewed?

MAJOR INJUSTICE IN DRBC’S DRAFT DOCKET – In Essence, DRBC’s DOCKET ALLOWS “EMINENT DOMAIN” OVER ALL OUR WATER RESOURCES IN THE EVENT OF A LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT ACCIDENT OR MELTDOWN.
• In A Limerick Nuclear Plant Emergency Or Meltdown, Limerick Would Get Unrestricted Access To All Water Resources, Including Groundwater, As Long As The Need Exists – Days, Weeks, Or Months.
­ Limerick Only Stores Enough Emergency Water Onsite For 48 Hours, and That Includes All Limerick’s Cooling Tower Water.
­ Exelon Is Required To Have A 30-Day Supply. They Must Be Counting On All Our Water.
­ What Happens In A Drought?. Groundwater Withdrawals at Limerick Could Run Residential Wells Dry For Miles Around Limerick, As Well As The Schuylkill River.
• We Learned Accidents and Meltdown Threats At Limerick Are Increasing. We Should NOT Face The Risk Of Losing All Access To A Safe, Usable Water Supply Due To Limerick Nuclear Plant.
• Exelon Should Not Be Given Legal Access To All Our Water.
 LIMERICK SHOULD BE CLOSED BEFORE THERE IS A MELTDOWN AND EVERYONE LOSES ALL THEIR WATER RESOURCES.

DANGEROUS DISCHARGES INTO THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER

RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES Into The Schuylkill River From Limerick Nuclear Plant
• Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Routine and Accidental Radioactive Discharges Into The Schuylkill River Are The Most Dangerous Threat To Those Whose Water Comes From The Schuylkill River.
• 5-Year Draft Permits For Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Discharges Have NO LIMITS For ALL Limerick’s Radionuclides Discharged Into the Schuylkill River,
• Limerick’s Radioactive Discharges Can Include Over 100 Different Radionuclides, Some With Very Long Half-lives. For Example, Strontium-90 has a half-life of 28 years. Cesium-137 has a half-life of 30 years.
• Additive, Cumulative, and Synergistic Impacts From All Radionuclides Released From Limerick Nuclear Plant Are Unknown, But Obviously Significant After 27 Years Of Discharges.
• Radionuclides Discharged From Limerick Into The Schuylkill River Do NOT Disappear. They Travel With Schuylkill River Water, But Are Rarely Monitored, Tested, Reported, or Filtered Out At Water Treatment Plants From Limerick to Philadelphia.
• Almost Two Million People Who Use Schuylkill River Water Are Exposed To These Radionuclides Through Their Drinking Water, and Through Food Grown In The Region Using Water From The Schuylkill River.
• Evidence of Harm – Philadelphia Is About 21 Miles Downstream From Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Radioactive Discharges. Philadelphia’s Drinking Water Was Found To Have The Highest Radiation Level Of All 66 Water Treatment Plants Testing Across The Nation After Fukushima. Iodine-131 Was The Radionuclide Tested. Limerick Discharges Iodine-131 Into The Schuylkill River.
• Limerick’s Radionuclides Also Get Into The Sediment and Fish, A Fact Proven By Exelon’s Own Radiological Monitoring Reports To NRC.
• DEP and DRBC Falsely Assert That NRC Protects Us From Limerick’s Radioactive Discharges Into The River. In fact, NRC NEVER TESTED FOR RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES INTO THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER FROM LIMERICK, NEITHER HAVE DRBC OR DEP.
 RADIATION DISCHARGES ARE BEING IGNORED BY DEP AND DRBC.
 THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR ISSUING THESE 5-YEAR PERMITS THAT RESULT IN LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT ROUTINELY DISCHARGING A BROAD RANGE OF RADIONUCLIDES INTO A VITAL DRINKING WATER SOURCE:
­ WITH NO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF EXPOSURE TO THAT RADIATION
­ WITHOUT REQUIRING LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT TO FILTER
 LIMERICK’S RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES ARE LEGALLY PERMITTED:
­ WITHOUT LIMITS
­ WITHOUT REQUIREMENTS FOR INDEPENDENT MONITORING OF DISCHARGES FOR ALL RADIONUCLIDES ASSOCIATED WITH LIMERICK’S OPERATIONS.
­ WITHOUT REQUIREMENTS FOR EXELON TO FILTER AT THE DISCHARGE POINT
­ WITHOUT REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER COMPANIES TO DO CONTINUOUS MONITORING AND FILTRATION FOR ALL LIMERICK’S RADIONUCLIDES
COOLING TOWER TOXICS ARE DISCHARGED INTO THE SCHUYKILL RIVER
 WITH NO LIMITS
 WITH “EXEMPTIONS” FROM REGULATION IN DEP’S NPDES PERMIT
• Massive Amounts of Extremely Toxic and Corrosive Chemicals Are Dumped Into The Cooling Towers Every Single Day.
• Chlorine is just one of a broad range of toxics used in the cooling towers. Chlorine, As Sodium Hypochlorite, Is Used At Limerick Every Day (16,000 to 58,000 POUNDS PER DAY).
• Most Cooling Tower Toxics Are Not Measured, Regulated, or Reported In Limerick’s Discharges Into The Schuylkill River.

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS (TDS) TRANSPORT RADIATION AND COOLING TOWER TOXICS INTO THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER
• Both DEP and Exelon Admit That Limerick Nuclear Plant Cannot Meet Safe Drinking Water Standards (500 mg/L) Under The Clean Water Act For Dangerous Limerick TDS Discharges.
• One 2010 Sample Was Almost 5 Times Higher Than The Safe Drinking Water Standards.
• There Was NO PENALTY, Even Though The Schuylkill River Is A Vital Source Of Drinking Water for Almost 2 Million People From Pottstown To Philadelphia.
• Limerick Nuclear Plant Drastically EXCEEDED Even DRBC’s TDS Discharge Limit of 1,000 mg/L in 13 of 15 Samples for 2010.
• Given The Content Of TDS Discharges From Limerick Nuclear Plant Into A Vital Drinking Water Source, DEP’s NPDES PERMIT IS FAILING TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH.
1. DEP MUST REQUIRE FILTRATION FOR TDS FROM LIMERICK’S RADIOACTIVE AND COOLING TOWER DISCHARGE PIPE 001 – NOT PROVIDE A PERMIT EXEMPTION FOR TDS FROM THIS DANGEROUS DISCHARGE PIPE.
2. IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR DEP TO ISSUE POLLUTION DISCHARGE PERMITS TO LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT WITH NO TDS LIMITS, BECAUSE LIMERICK CANNOT MEET STANDARDS IN PLACE TO PROTECT DRINKING WATER.
3. WHY WOULD EXELON BE PERMITTED TO DO THEIR OWN SAMPLING 30 MONTHS “AFTER” PERMITS ARE ISSUED, TO SATISFY DRBC REQUIRMENTS OF 1,000 mg/L?
4. A BODY OF EVIDENCE SHOWS WHY WE CAN’T TRUST EXELON. THEY HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME. WHO COULD BELIEVE THEIR SAMPLING?
5. DEP SHOULD NOT TURN OVER TDS REGULATORY AUTHORITY TO DRBC, AN AGENCY WITH NO TEETH TO REQUIRE ENFORCEMENT OF LIMITS.

24 DISCHARGE POINTS FROM LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT END UP IN THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER.
 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ARE WOEFULLY INADEQUATE AND UNPROTECTIVE.
• 2 TIMES PER MONTH – Monitoring For Outfall 001, The Most Dangerous Discharge Point Because It Discharges Radiation, Cooling Tower Chemicals, and TDS.
­ NO ONE MONITORS FOR RADIATION OR OTHER COOLING TOWER TOXICS.
Comprehensive Independent Testing From Outfall 001 For All Limerick’s Radionuclides Has Never Been Done By Any Agency, Including NRC, DRBC, nor DEP
­ Without Monitoring For All Radionuclides and Toxics It Is Impossible To Identify Spikes or Determine Health Threats.
­ Without Continuous Monitoring It Is Impossible to Identify Spikes
• 1 TIME PER YEAR – Monitoring for All Other 23 Discharge Points From Limerick’s Site.

Monitoring, Calculating, Testing, And Reporting Are All Unreliable And Unprotective
• Exelon, The Company With A Vested Interest In The Outcome, That Has Shown It Can’t Be Trusted For Full and Timely Disclosure Controls The Entire Process, With Lax Agency Oversight And NO Enforcement for Violations – Details www.acereport.org #20 “Why We Can’t Trust Exelon”
• Exelon’s Monitoring Reports Are Loaded With Loopholes and Deception.
• Water Companies Don’t Protect Your Water From Limerick’s Radioactive Discharges
• 3-19-12 Radioactive Spill, Is An Example Of How Public Health Is Jeopardized By Exelon
­ The Public Was NOT Notified Until 23 Days Later
People From Limerick to Philadelphia Did Not Know It Could Have Been Unsafe To Use Their Water.
­ Regulators / Elected Officials Not Notified Immediately Then Remained Silent. ‘
­ Exelon, NOT WATER COMPANIES, Tested After The Radioactive Spill.

HEATED DISCHARGES – Into The Schuylkill River
• Limerick Discharges 14.2 Million Gallons Per Day = Over 5 Billion Gallons Per Year.
• Discharges Are Permitted To Be As High As 110 Degrees.
• After 27 Years, 135 Billion Gallons Of Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Heated Discharges, Up To 110 Degrees, Obviously Raised The Temperature Of The Schuylkill River From Limerick to Philadelphia.

TEMPERATURES In The Schuylkill River REPEATEDLY EXCEEDED The 87 Degree Limit,
2 MILES DOWNSTREAM From Limerick’s Heated Discharges, At Royersford’s Intake.
• DEP Has An 87 Degree Schuylkill River Water Temperature Limit.
• DRBC’s Ambient Temperature Limit of 87 Degrees For The Schuylkill River.
• 2 Miles Downstream from Limerick’s Heated Discharges The River’s 87 Degree Limit Was Repeatedly EXCEEDED – At Royersford’s PA American Water Intake.
• It is predictable that after 27 years of Limerick Nuclear Plant’s 24/7 highly heated discharges, that the river temperature would EXCEED 87 Degrees.
• Limerick Discharges Are Allowed To Be 110 Degrees, 23 Degrees Higher Than The River’s Temperature Limit.
• Limerick’s heated discharges could be even higher than 110 degrees. ONLY Exelon knows temperatures actually released. There has never been independent long-term heat monitoring by any agency, directly beyond Limerick’s heated discharges into the Schuylkill River.
• Harmful impacts could obviously be significant to ecosystems, yet there has never been a long-term independent study.
• Huge fish kills occurred repeatedly close to Limerick’s heated discharge point. Limerick’s heated, radioactive discharges were the most likely cause, but there was never an independent investigation to prove cause.
 DEP/DRBC NEGLIGENCE.- BOTH AGENCIES INTEND TO ISSUE LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT’S PERMITS ALLOWING HEATED DISCHARGES WITHOUT ADDRESSING THE FACT THAT LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT’S HEATED DISCHARGES ARE OVERHEATING THE RIVER. THERE IS:
­ NO PENALTY FOR OVERHEATING OF THE RIVER
­ NO REQUIREMENT FOR INDEPENDENT RIVER TEMPERATURE MONITORING AT ROYERSFORD, 2 MILES DOWNSTREAM FROM LIMERICK DISCHARGES.
­ NO REQUIREMENT FOR LIMERICK TO CUT POWER, TO LOWER TEMPERATURES, EVEN IN EXTREME HEAT AND DROUGHT.
 THERE IS ONLY A REQUIRMENT “AFTER” THE PERMIT IS ISSUED APRIL 2013, FOR EXELON TO PREPARE A CHART ON HOW OFTEN TEMPERATURES ARE EXCEEDED OVER 87 DEGREES, BASED ON ONLY EXELON’S OWN HEAT MONITORING AT ROYERSFORD.

DRBC’S 59 DEGREE TEMPERATURE RESTRICTION SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED
• DRBC Had A 59 Degree Temperature Restriction Since The Early 1980s, Before Limerick Started To Operate In 1985.
• According to DRBC Documents, The Reason For The 59 Degree Temperature Restriction –
“To Protect Schuylkill River Flow And Water Quality Conditions Until 2020”.
• Dissolved Oxygen Testing Is Easily Manipulated To Hide Elevations, Yet Based Only On Exelon’s Dissolved Oxygen Testing, DRBC Agreed To Eliminate Its Temperature Precaution, Originally In Place To Protect The Schuylkill River Flow and Water Quality Conditions That Were To Be Enforced Until 2020.
• DRBC’s DRAFT DOCKET Removes This Decades Old Protection For Schuylkill River Quality and Flow, Regardless Of Harmful Consequences.
 THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE. EVIDENCE SHOWS WE CAN’T TRUST EXELON.
 DRBC’S 59 DEGREE RESTRICTION SHOULD BE REINSTATED MINIMALLY UNTIL 2020.

TOXIC MINE WATER PUMPING INTO THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER MUST BE FILTERED IF EXELON WANTS TO KEEP USING THAT WATER FOR LIMERICK OPERATIONS.

• DEP Said, “Mine Water Is The Worst Threat To Groundwater In PA”, Yet DEP Is A Cheerleader For Exelon’s Massive Mine Water Pumping (UNFILTERED) Into the Schuylkill River.
• Billions of Gallons Of Toxic, Unfiltered Mine Water Have Been Pumped At 10,000 Gallons PER MINUTE Into The Schuylkill River, A Vital Drinking Water Source, Since 2003, For The Benefit Of Limerick Nuclear Plant Operations and Exelon’s Profits.
• DEP Lost Credibility When Comparing Mine Water Run-Off To Pumping 10,000 Gallons Per Minute And Making The Unsubstantiated Claim That Dilution Is The Answer To This Intentional Pollution.
• If DRBC ‘s Docket for Limerick Is Approved, Billions More Could Be Pumped EVERY YEAR, Compounding And Increasing Problems and Threats.

 This Is Without A Doubt, An Additive And Cumulative Toxic Threat To Public Health Which Can Also Increase Costs To Water Treatment Systems and Their Customers.
 Major Toxics Discharged Into the Schuylkill River Due to Wadesville Mine Water Pumping Include Iron, Manganese, and TDS, All Of Which Were Found Elevated By 2008, After 5 Years of Pumping, At Pottstown Waste Water Treatment Plant, The First Schuylkill River Drinking Water Intake After Wadesville Mine Water Pumping.

• Iron – 20 Times Safe Drinking Water Standards – Discharge Limit From Wadesville Mine Pit Into The Schuylkill River. Iron Can Cause Cancer and Hemochromotosis, As Well As Costly Breakdown Of Equipment At Water Treatment Plants.
• Manganese – 80 Times Safe Drinking Water Standards – Discharge Limit From Wadesville Mine Pit Into The Schuylkill River. Manganese Can Cause Permanent Brain Damage, After 10 Years Of Exposure Through Showering 10 Minutes A Day.
• Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) – Caused Problems At Pottstown After Only A Few Years Of Pumping.

 DRBC’s Docket Allows Exelon To Pump Up to 432 Million Gallons Per Month. Exelon Should Be Required to Filter All Toxic Mine Water Pumped Into The Schuylkill River For Limerick Operations, Or Exelon Should Be Stopped From Pumping It.

Changes Can Be Made To DEP’s Draft Permit Requiring Exelon To Be Accountable To Reduce Toxic Treats To Water And Health, In Order To Follow The Law And To Improve Oversight and Enforcement Of Violations.

PA DEP DRAFT NPDES PERMIT – NO: PA0051926
Urge PA Elected Officials To Ask DEP and Governor Corbett To:
1. Remove Exemption For Radiation And Cooling Toxics In TDS Pollution Discharges
2. Require Strict Enforcement And Meaningful Penalties For Violations Of Clean Water Act Standards
3. Require Independent Comprehensive Testing
4. Require Immediate Notification Of Radioactive Spills
5. Require Exelon To Maintain All Records Permanently, Not Just 3 Years
6. Require Exelon To Filter Or Close Limerick
7. Require Reverse Osmosis Filtration For TDS, With Frequent Filter Changes To Protect The River and Public Health

DRBC’s Planned Approvals For Limerick Nuclear Plant Will Lead To Increased Threats To Public Water In Six Counties

DRBC DRAFT DOCKET – NO. D-1969-210 cp-13
Urge PA Elected Officials To Ask DEP and Governor Corbett To:
1. NOT Allow Increased Water Use for Limerick Nuclear Plant
2. Stop Mine Water Pumping for Limerick Operations or Require Exelon to Filter
3. NOT Issue Limerick’s Docket Without TDS Limits For Outfall 001
4. Require Limerick to Reduce Operations or Shut Down When River Temperatures Exceed 87 Degree Limit
5. Require Unannounced Independent Testing for Low Flow Limits, Temperature Restrictions, and All Radiation and Toxic Chemicals
6. Require Public Notice and Input For All Future Limerick Nuclear Plant Water Use
7. Require An Independent Mediator to Hear and Adjudicate All Water Related Claims Against Limerick and Exelon

If Exelon Refuses To Filter and Comply With Laws To Protect Our Water,
Then Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Water Permits
Should NOT Be Approved and Limerick Should Be Forced To Close.

For More Information – ACE Website www.acereport.org
­ Section #6 – “Schuylkill River, Limerick’s Operations Threaten Drinking Water Disaster”
­ Section #20 – “Why We Can’t Trust Exelon”

To Prevent a Drinking Water Disaster from Pottstown to Philadelphia, Limerick Must Close

The Alliance For A Clean Environment ACE Website Blog Post

Blog Post #4 – May 16 , 2012

To Prevent a Drinking Water Disaster from Pottstown to Philadelphia, Limerick Must Close

Limerick Nuclear Power Plant Radioactive Spills and Routine Radioactive Releases Pose Unprecedented Threats To Drinking Water. Limerick Nuclear Plant Must Shut Down To Protect The Drinking Water Supply For Almost Two Million People From Pottstown To Philadelphia.

Overview: Evidence from the past suggests Limerick Nuclear Plant should never have been constructed here based on its unprecedented threats and harms to drinking water.

DRBC, DEP, and NRC allowed Limerick Nuclear Plant to be constructed here, knowing the Schuylkill River could not sustain the long term extraordinary water needs that would be required to maintain Limerick’s cooling towers, or take the continuous radioactive, and heated discharges from the facility.

Extraordinary harms to the drinking water supply for so many people were obviously inevitable, yet ignored, based on evidence in decades old testimony obtained through FOIA Requests by ACE. Harms and threats have been evident and have increased dramatically, since Limerick was licensed decades ago.

NRC recently confirmed that Limerick Nuclear Plant has had four reported spills in the past four years. Two of them admittedly included radioactive waste. We are expected to take Exelon’s word that the other two contained no radioactive waste. The most recent spill occurred on March 19, 2012, and is addressed in this blog posting.

The situation is virtually assured to get worse, far worse, the longer Limerick depletes and contaminates the Schuylkill River, public drinking water, and groundwater. Now, after decades of damage and deception, regulators owe it to the millions of residents in this region who could face the devastating consequences of losing a safe water supply, to close Limerick Nuclear Plant as soon as possible.

Closing Limerick Is The Moral, Ethical Thing To Do For Precaution and Prevention.

1. Ever- Increasing Potential For Irreversible Drinking Water Disaster

- Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Threats To Public Drinking Water Are Unprecedented, Unacceptable, and Increasing Every Day Limerick Operates.
- If Limerick Continues To Operate There May NOT Be Enough Safe Drinking Water For Almost Two Million People From Pottstown to Philadelphia.
- There is not an endless supply of sea water as at Fukushima, only the public’s ever-shrinking drinking water source, the Schuylkill River.
- 4-18-12, at NRC’s meeting in Limerick, ACE asked where the water would come from to deal with Limerick meltdowns, and where would the highly radioactive run-off go?
NRC response 5-9-12:
• There is only enough water for 48 hours of continuous use (including water from the cooling towers, spray pond and ground water tanks. After that it would come from the Schuylkill River. At Fukushima they continued to need water for months after the disaster.
• NRC failed to respond to where the radioactive run-off would go.

2. Signs of Dangerous Water Contamination Threats To Public Health From
Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Routine Operations Are Already Evident.

Radiation
- Drinking water from the Schuylkill River is already radioactive from Limerick Nuclear Plant’s routine operations.
- Radiation is showing up at some of the highest levels in the nation in Philadelphia water.
- EPA water testing after Fukushima found Iodine-131 in Philadelphia water at the highest levels of all other nuclear plants tested.
- Limerick Nuclear Plant’s routine wastewater discharges are obviously already a major factor in the Iodine-131 radiation found in Philadelphia drinking water.
- Obviously water from the Schuylkill River would NOT be safe to use after a meltdown, even if there was enough.

Iron and Manganese
- To supplement the Schuylkill River flow for Limerick Nuclear Plant operations, starting in 2003, Exelon pumped massive amounts of unfiltered mine water, loaded with iron and manganese, into the Schuylkill River.
- By 2008, Pottstown, the first public drinking water intake showed elevated levels of iron and manganese in testing.

Double Increase In Pollution Discharges From Limerick Nuclear Plant
Exelon’s Request for Limerick Nuclear Plant Discharges to the Schuylkill River (NPDES Permit)
- Instead of providing filtration, Exelon is asking for a permit limit increase that is four times safe drinking water standards.
- If approved, this will increase threats to health and costs for water to those depending on water companies that draw water from the Schuylkill River.

3. Limerick Nuclear Plant’s 3-19-12 Radioactive Spill
Illustrates How The System Fails To Protect Public Health Related To Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Radioactive Threats To Drinking Water.

- A significant Limerick Nuclear Plant radioactive spill was discovered by a guard March 19, 2012 at 3:00 AM. Exelon claims the spill started at 1:35 AM on March 19th. However, there is no independent verification of how long the spill from Outfall 023 continued before it was accidentally detected by the guard at 3:00 AM
- Exelon negligently failed to notify the public for over three weeks, then downplayed the spill, describing what they claimed was a 15,000 gallon spill as a puddle, and asserting that it contained only one kind of radiation, tritium.
- This was hardly just a simple harmless “spill” when it knocked off a manhole cover, lasted days, and was significant enough to cause visible erosion (according to NRC resident inspectors). Water blew off a manhole cover and ran out a large pipe for a long period of time into Possum Hollow Run Streambed (Discharge Point 023) and into the Schuylkill River.
- As much as 15,000 gallons of radioactive reactor water spilled (Estimated by Exelon) with no verification whatsoever. Radioactive spill could be at least several hundred thousand gallons.
• NRC officials admitted to ACE 4-18-12, that NRC is not really sure how much water was released. NRC made no attempt to independently verify Exelon’s estimate.
• Exelon’s math is fuzzy
- Intentional Deception? Discrepancies in Reporting On Limerick’s Spill
• NRC illogically protested to a reporter that Exelon should have reported it to NRC, which would automatically get posted on the NRC website. However, Exelon did report it to on-site NRC officials, March 19, 16 hours after the spill. NRC should have immediately reported the spill to the media.
 NRC’s website posting, didn’t come until April 11, 2012, several weeks after the spill.
 NRC failed to protect public health by failing to immediately notify the public.
• NRC officials said spill went unreported immediately because “Exelon determined it was NOT reportable”.
 This appears to have been a convenient delay to avoid full and accurate disclosure during the worst part of the consequences.
 Three weeks after the 3-19-12 spill, on 4-11-12 when independent verification was no longer an option, Exelon filed a report to NRC.
• NRC had few answers about the spill by 4-18-12, knowing they would be questioned about the spill at their annual meeting on Limerick.
- The public had NO idea Limerick’s radioactive “spill” occurred, because no public announcement was made at the time of the spill.
- 16 hours after the spill was detected, at 5:00 PM on March 19th, Exelon implemented additional controls to prevent the overflow.
- NRC’s resident inspectors were first notified by Exelon at 5:00 PM on March 19th, 16 hours after the spill was first detected. NRC should have provided immediate full public disclosure about the radioactive spill to try to protect public health.
- 3-20, the next day, NRC dispatched a “radiation specialist” to review the event and Exelon’s actions. Apparently little was learned. When NRC held its annual Limerick meeting 4-18-12, NRC inspectors could not provide very important details on the spill.
- 40 hours after the spill was first detected, state and local officials were informed (5:00 PM on 3-20) They were told Increased levels of tritium were found in water samples collected from the spill area. Exelon failed to provide officials with full, accurate, and timely disclosure.
- Even after public officials were informed 3-20 – almost two days after the spill – NOT ONE notified the public. Who was notified, but then failed to inform the public?
- The cause of the back-up was not unclogged and cleared by Exelon until 3-21, two days after the spill was first discovered.
- Exelon claimed the cause of the backup of cooling tower blowdown and reactor water was due to clogging of the Schuylkill River diffuser (Limerick’s Radioactive Discharge Pipe – Outfall 001)
- Exelon failed to make an official notification to NRC or state and local elected officials until 23 days after the spill, after which the public was finally notified by the Pottstown Mercury.
- Evan Brandt did excellent reporting in the Pottstown Mercury to notify the public, but only over 3 weeks after the spill, when it finally appeared on NRC’s website.
- Exelon told Mercury reporter Brandt the spill of reactor water into the river was “No Big Deal” and it was a “Permitted Discharge”. While deceptively attempting to assert no harm, this was the first time Exelon admitted that Limerick has routine radioactive discharges into a vital source of drinking water, the Schuylkill River.
- Limerick’s spill impacted the water of over 1 1/2 million people from Phoenixville to Philadelphia.

4. The Tritium Scam

NRC and Exelon attempted to make us believe Limerick’s leak was just one radinuclide, tritium, and that tritium levels were within some magical deceptive “safe limit”.

THE TRUTH IS:
- LIMERICK’S SPILL WAS NOT JUST TRITIUM
- RESEARCH SHOWS TRITIUM IS VERY HARMFUL TO HEALTH
- Even if Limerick’s spill would have been just tritium,
• How can NRC claim 20,000 picocuries per liter of tritium is a safe limit?
• or Exelon claim 5 times that amount is NO BIG DEAL?
- Customers of water companies drawing from the Schuylkill River were just exposed to elevated levels of the synergistic impacts from many dangerous radionuclides that entered the Schuylkill River as a result of Limerick Nuclear Plant’s radioactive spill.

5. Exelon’s Track Record Here and Elsewhere Shows Why We Can’t Trust Them To Provide Accurate and Timely Disclosure.

- Yet Exelon controls all Limerick Nuclear Plant monitoring, testing, and reporting.
• Specifics showing why we can’t trust Exelon’s data – See Section 20 www.acereport.org.
• To determine our radiation risks from Limerick Nuclear Plant, we basically rely on the company with a vested interest in the outcome that can’t be trusted.
- The recent spill is a perfect example of how Exelon avoids full, accurate, timely disclosure.
- To assert there is no risk from radioactive discharges from Limerick’s reactor
into a public drinking water source defies logic and reality.
- To assert water from Limerick’s reactor is only tritium is a shameful lie.

Dr. Lewis Cuthbert
ACE President