Tell DEP to Protect Our Water! Sample Letter to Send to DEP

Jennifer Fields, Clean Water Management Program Manager
PA Department of Environmental Protection
2 E. Main Street
Norristown, PA 19401
Jefields@pa.gov

RE: Limerick Nuclear Plant’s NPDES Permit No. PA0051926

Dear Ms. Fields,

DEP’s mission is to protect public water and public health. We have a right to clean water under Clean Water Laws, which DEP should be enforcing. DEP’s NPDES permits are permits to pollute our water.

Limerick Nuclear Plant’s discharges (5 billion gallons per year), are by far the worst threat to the Schuylkill River and public health because they include a broad range of radionuclides, some with very long half-lives.

Loopholes and exemptions in Limerick Nuclear Plant’s DRAFT NPDES permit ignore Limerick’s most dangerous discharges into the Schuylkill River, a vital water resource for almost two million people from Pottstown to Philadelphia. Harmful impacts from Limerick Nuclear Plant’s discharges on our water and health do not disappear because DEP allows permit loopholes and exemptions.

To protect Schuylkill River water and health of almost two million people, I urge DEP to make the following changes to the DRAFT NPDES permit for Limerick Nuclear Plant:

Changes Needed to DEP’s DRAFT NPDES Permit Include:

1. Remove the permit EXEMPTION for Total Dissolved Solids from Outfall 001

Justification:
• Outfall 001 TDS transports radiation and cooling tower toxics, Limerick’s most dangerous pollution into the Schuylkill River.
• The Safe Drinking Water TDS limit is 500 mg/L. DEP and Exelon both admitted Limerick can’t meet Limerick’s previous limit of 1000 mg/L. Previous discharges were up to over 2,400 mg/L. Exempting this harmful pollution because Limerick can’t meet the limit is negligent.
• With NO TDS permit limit, Limerick circumvents enforcement of Safe Drinking Water standards under Clean Water Laws, while continuing to seriously jeopardize water and health.

2. Require Exelon to FILTER TDS from Outfall 001 with reverse osmosis or CLOSE Limerick.

Justification:
• Limerick routinely discharges a broad range of radionuclides, including Iodine-131, Cesium-137, and Strontium-90, into the Schuylkill River with TDS discharges. There is no safe level of exposure according the National Academy of Sciences. Added, cumulative, and synergistic impacts while unknown, are obviously significant.
• DEP can reduce Limerick’s radioactive discharges by requiring TDS filtration. While filtration could be expensive for Exelon, radioactive contamination of vital water supplies could be far more costly to the public.

3. Conduct independent, comprehensive monitoring

Justification:
• All monitoring, testing, and reporting are controlled by Exelon, a company that has repeatedly proven here and elsewhere, that it can’t be trusted to provide full, accurate, and timely disclosure.
• DEP’s monitoring requirements for Limerick Nuclear Plant are woefully inadequate. For example:
 2 times a month for Outfall 001 and NOT for radiation and some cooling tower toxics in TDS,
 1 time a year for all other 23 discharges, directly and indirectly, into the Schuylkill River.
• If DEP doesn’t have the funding for meaningful oversight, Limerick should close.

4. Require Exelon to maintain all records permanently, not just 3 years.

Justification:
• Records should be put into electronic files with back-up CDs that should be maintained until the completion of decommissioning.

5. Require IMMEDIATE PUBLIC NOTIFICATION of radioactive spills

Justification:
• Unless the public is notified immediately, people are not given an opportunity to avoid exposure to accidentally increased radioactive exposure.
• The public was not notified until 23 days after Limerick’s 3-19-12 radioactive “spill”. Public health was jeopardized. Notification needs to be immediate, not just to DEP, but also for the public.

Please provide detailed responses to each of my specific requests for changes which would result in reduced threats to public water and health, related to Limerick Nuclear Plant’s NPDES permit.

Sincerely,

Action Alert! Attend PA DEP/DRBC Public Hearing on Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Permits to Use and Pollute Water 8-28-12r

ACTION ALERT!

ATTEND IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEARING ON LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT’S WATER PERMITS FOR USE AND ABUSE OF OUR VITAL WATER SUPPLIES 8-28-12

IT’S OUR WATER!
Don’t Let Exelon Get Away With, In Essence, “Eminent Domain”, of Our Water Resources In Parts of Six Counties For Limerick Nuclear Plant Operations and Exelon Profits.

GET THE FACTS. LET YOUR VOICE BE HEARD!
Let DEP And DRBC Know How You Feel About Exelon Using And Abusing Our Water For Profit At Limerick Nuclear Plant, While We Risk Having No Water or Water Too Radioactive To Use Safely!

WE NEED SAFE WATER! WE DON’T NEED LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT!
Limerick’s electric goes to the grid, supplying only ½ of 1% of our nation’s energy. It’s sold across several states, but we face unprecedented use and abuse of our water. Safer energy alternatives are ready now, that won’t threaten our water supply.

SPEAK OUT OR LET YOUR PRESENCE BE YOUR VOICE!

TUESDAY, AUGUST 28, 2012, 6:00 to 9:00 P.M.
Sunnybrook Ballroom in Pottstown

PERMIT CHANGES MUST BE MADE TO PROTECT OUR WATER.
Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Unprecedented Private Use and Abuse of Our Waters Could Get Worse.
 SAY NO to Limerick’s dangerous discharges into the Schuylkill River, which include radiation and cooling tower toxics with NO LIMITS.
 SAY NO to increased use of our water from many sources and unrestricted use in the event of an accident or meltdown of all sources, including Schuylkill and Delaware Rivers, groundwater, and others.
 SAY NO, in essence, to a DRBC CZAR, who would unilaterally decide whether Exelon is required to compensate you for damages if Limerick renders your well or surface water dry or otherwise unusable from radiation.

LIST OF WHAT IS NEEDED BELOW

PA DEP NPDES Permit And DRBC Docket
DEMAND Changes Below To:
PA DEP DRAFT NPDES PERMIT – NO: PA0051926

Urge PA Elected Officials To Ask DEP and Governor Corbett To:
1. Remove Exemption For Radiation And Cooling Toxics In TDS Pollution Discharges
2. Require Strict Enforcement And Meaningful Penalties For Violations Of Clean Water Act Standards
3. Require Independent Comprehensive Testing
4. Require Immediate Notification Of Radioactive Spills
5. Require Exelon To Maintain All Records Permanently, Not Just 3 Years
6. Require Exelon To Filter Or Close Limerick
7. Require Reverse Osmosis Filtration For TDS, With Frequent Filter Changes To Protect The River and Public Health

DEMAND Changes Below To:
DRBC DRAFT DOCKET – NO. D-1969-210 cp-13

Urge PA Elected Officials To Ask DRBC and Governor Corbett To:
1. NOT Allow Increased Water Use for Limerick Nuclear Plant
2. Stop Mine Water Pumping for Limerick Operations or Require Exelon to Filter
3. NOT Issue Limerick’s Docket Without TDS Limits For Outfall 001
4. Require Limerick to Reduce Operations or Shut Down When River Temperatures Exceed 87 Degree Limit
5. Require Unannounced Independent Testing for Low Flow Limits, Temperature Restrictions, and All Radiation and Toxic Chemicals
6. Require Public Notice and Input For All Future Limerick Nuclear Plant Water Use
7. Require An Independent Mediator to Hear and Adjudicate All Water Related Claims Against Limerick and Exelon

DEP and DRBC Will Accept Your Comments On Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Water Use And Discharges
YOUR WRITTEN COMMENTS
DEADLINE – OCTOBER 27, 2012 5:00 P.M.

SEND YOUR COMMENTS TO:

#1 PA DEP – DRAFT NPDES PERMIT NO: PA0051926
PA DEP Attention: Jenifer Fields
Southeast Regional Office, Water Management,
2 E. Main Street, Norristown, PA 19401
Fax to (484) 250-5971 Via Email to jefields@pa.gov

#2 DRBC – DRAFT Docket No. D-1969-210 CP-13
P.O. Box 7360
Attention: DRBC Secretary
West Trenton, NJ 08628-0360
Fax To (609) 883-9522 Via email to Paula.Schmitt@drbc.state.nj.us

CONTACT ALL LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL OFFICIALS
Ask Them To Get The Facts and Speak Out NOW To Protect Our Water.
Their Silence and Support Protects Exelon’s Profits, NOT Our Water.

For Details – www.acereport.org
­ Blog Posting: Summary Report “Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Use and Abuse Of Our Water” (August 2012)

­ Homepage Section #6: “Schuylkill River, Limerick’s Operations Threaten Drinking Water Disaster”

­ Homepage Section #20: “Why We Can’t Trust Exelon”

Aside

Summary Report: Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Use and Abuse of Our Water, August 2012

ACE Summary Report – August, 2012
IT’S ABOUT OUR WATER!

Don’t Let Exelon Get Away With, In Essence, “Eminent Domain”, of Our Water Resources In Parts of Six Counties For Limerick Nuclear Plant Operations and Exelon Profits.

LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT IMPACTS WATER ACROSS SIX COUNTIES
Including Schuylkill, Berks, Montgomery, Chester, Bucks, and Philadelphia

Details Summarized In This Report Reveal Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Unprecedented And Unjust Use And Abuse Of Our Water That Are Being Whitewashed And Legalized By Agencies That Supposedly Protect Our Water and Health.

But, DEP’S NPDES PERMIT And DRBC’s DOCKET Are
STILL DRAFTS – THEY’RE NOT A DONE DEAL!

It’s VERY Important For You To Attend The Public Hearing Tuesday, 8-28-12
6:00 To 9:00 P.M. Sunnybrook Ballroom In Pottstown

The Alliance For A Clean Environment (ACE), Investigated Many Pollution Threats To Public Water Over The Past 15 Years. After Review Of Documents And Permits On Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Harms And Threats Since 2006, We Concluded Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Water Use and Discharges Clearly Present The Most Dangerous Threats To Public Water Supplies For The Largest Numbers Of People.

In Essence – To Protect Our Water, Exelon Must Be Required To:
 Filter Out Toxics Which Jeopardize Water And Health
 Comply With Clean Water Standards and Laws – With NO EXEMPTIONS
 Face Revoking Of Limerick’s Permits For Violations Of The Law

Our View:
WE NEED SAFE WATER! WE DON’T NEED LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT!
We Must Have An Ample, Safe Water Supply To Thrive and Survive. Limerick Nuclear Plant Threatens Water Resources In The Many Serious Ways Revealed In This Report. Limerick’s electric goes to the grid, supplying only ½ of 1% of our nation’s energy. It’s sold across several states, but we face unprecedented use and abuse of our water. Safer energy alternatives are ready now, that won’t threaten our water supply.

At The End Of This Report, We Prepared A List Of Suggested Changes That, If Made, Could Reduce Some Of The Serious Risks We Face, For Both DEP’s Permit To Pollute The Schuylkill River and DRBC’s Permit Allowing Limerick to Have “In Essence Eminent Domain” Over Our Water.

We Must OPPOSE One Person, A Biased “DRBC CZAR” Deciding If Exelon Is Held Accountable For Limerick Nuclear Plant Rendering Wells Or Surface Waters Dry Or Otherwise Unusable From Radiation Or Other Toxic Discharges. Victims Would Even Be Forced To Hire A Hydrologist To Present “The Czar” With A Report.

YOU CAN HELP PROTECT OUR WATER!
REVIEW THE FACTS IN THIS REPORT AND SPEAK UP NOW!
1. ATTEND DEP/DRBC PUBLIC HEARING, Tuesday 8-28-12, From 6:00 to 9:00 PM
Parents, Grandparents, All Concerned Citizens – This Is Our Opportunity To Reduce Limerick’s Threats To Our Water.
Please Take Time to Attend. Speak Out Or Let Your Presence Be Your Voice.
2. SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS BY OCTOBER 27, 2012 by 5:00 P.M.
Before Or After The Hearing You Can Submit Written Comments
Addresses Listed On ACE Blog For Public Hearing
Please Copy ACE at either:
aceactivists@comcast.net or 1189 Foxview Road, Pottstown, PA 19465
3. ASK ELECTED OFFICIALS TO SPEAK UP TO PROTECT OUR WATER
Their Silence Protects Exelon Profits, Not Our Water

DETAILS BELOW
REVEAL THAT YOUR WATER IS NOT BEING PROTECTED!

Unprecedented Use and Abuse of Public Water Resources For Profit
• PA DEP and DRBC Will Hold A Joint Public Hearing August 28, 2012 at Sunnybrook in Pottstown
• DEP and DRBC Went To Extraordinary Lengths To Avoid Enforcement of Limits and Law
• Problem: Limerick Nuclear Plant Can’t Meet The Clean Water Law Without Filtration, But Instead of Requiring Filtration, DEP and DRBC Plan to Issue Permits With NO LIMITS. Eliminating Limits Protects Exelon’s Profits, But Jeopardizes The Health Of Almost Two Million People From Pottstown to Philadelphia, Who Depend On The Schuylkill River For Their Water.
• PA DEP Draft Permit – To Be Issued By April 2013 For 5 Years – Most Alarming Issues:
­ Radiation and Cooling Tower Toxics In TDS Discharges From Outfall 001 Would Be Allowed To Be Discharged Into The Schuylkill River With No Limits, Even Though The Schuylkill River Is a Drinking Water Source For Almost Two Million People From Pottstown to Philadelphia.
­ Both DEP and Exelon Admit Limerick Can’t Meet Safe Drinking Water Standards.
­ Limerick’s TDS Discharges Drastically Exceeded DRBC Limits – (2010 Data- Nearly 5 Times Higher Than Safe Standards).
­ DEP Exempted Discharge 001 Instead Of Requiring Filtration To Protect Public Health
• DRBC Draft Docket (Permit) – To Be Issued April, 2013 – Most Alarming Issues:
­ In Essence, DRBC’s Docket Would Give Limerick Nuclear Plant “Eminent Domain” Over Our Vital Water Resources
­ In Essence, DRBC’s Docket Would Eliminate Future Public Participation
­ More Water Would Be Allocated To Limerick Nuclear Plant From Many Sources
­ The Schuylkill River Would Basically Be Dedicated To Limerick Nuclear Plant
­ For An Accident or Meltdown, Limerick Would Have Unrestricted Water Use From All Sources, For An Unlimited Amount Of Time
­ DRBC’s Director Would Unilaterally Decide All Claims Against Exelon For Water Loss Or Contamination
­ Victims Would Be Forced To Pay For A Hydrologist Study To Present To The DRBC Director For Claims Against Exelon

DEP and DRBC DRAFT Permits Protect Exelon’s Profits, NOT Our Water
• Permit Approvals Could Lead To A Drinking Water Disaster, Especially In The Schuylkill River, Which Is A Vital Water Source For Almost 2 Million People and Businesses from Pottstown to Philadelphia.
• DEP and DRBC Are NOT Objective. Before Limerick Started Operating, These Agencies Gave Approvals Allowing Limerick To Start Operating, Knowing The Schuylkill River Could Not Sustain The Insatiable Water Needs Of Limerick’s Cooling Towers.
• Current DRAFT Permits Continue To Ignore Limerick’s Unprecedented Threats and Harms To Our Water.
• Both Agencies Plan To Issue Permits Knowing Limerick’s Dangerous TDS Discharges Can’t Meet Safe Drinking Water Limits Into The Schuylkill River, A Vital Drinking Water Source For Almost 2 Million People.
• DRBC’s Permit Jeopardizes The Water Supply Across 6 Counties and S.R. Water Quality.
• DEP’s NPDES Permit Is A Permit To Pollute The Schuylkill River:
­ With Radiation and Other Cooling Tower Toxics – With No Limits
­ With Woefully Inadequate Monitoring, Testing, and Reporting Which Are All Controlled By Exelon, A Company We Can’t Trust To Provide Full and Accurate Disclosure
­ With NO Independent Testing Of Limerick’s Most Dangerous Discharges Or Actual Oversight
• To Enforce The Law To Protect Our Water, Both DEP and DRBC Should Refuse To Issue Permits Until Exelon Agrees To FILTER Limerick’s Intake and Discharges, As Well As Wadesville Mine Water Discharges.
• Exelon Should Filter or Close Limerick Nuclear Power Plant.
• If The Public Doesn’t Speak Out, These Agencies Will Continue to Protect Exelon Profits At The Expense Of Our Water.

DRBC Was Negligent From The Beginning
• Limerick Nuclear Plant Should NOT Have Been Built Along The Schuylkill River. There’s Never Been Enough Water In The Schuylkill River, To Sustain The Insatiable Water Needs Of Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Cooling Towers.
• DRBC Approved Limerick Nuclear Plant’s 1st Docket in the 1980s, Allowing Limerick To Start Operating, Knowing There Wasn’t enough water in the Schuylkill River.
• Proof: DRBC’s requirement for Exelon to spend the money to transport water from the Delaware River by way of the Perkiomen Creek.
• Problem: DRBC failed to do the math showing billions of gallons of water MORE EACH YEAR would be withdrawn from the Schuylkill River than discharged, even after Delaware River supplementation.
• The Delaware River Provided Only A Fraction Of Water Supplementation Needed To Stop Schuylkill River Depletion Over The Past 27 Years.
• FOIA records show DRBC ignored concerns expressed by many in our region BEFORE Limerick’s water use was approved by DRBC. Concerns included – Limerick Nuclear Plant’s harmful impacts to the Schuylkill River, the public water supply, and public health.
• Concerns were justified. The injustice of Limerick’s long-term consequences on our water supply are magnified now in times of heat waves and drought.

Negligence In Current DEP and DRBC Permitting
• DEP and DRBC Pass The Buck and Allow Exelon To Control All Monitoring, Testing, and Reporting.
• DEP’s NPDES Permit Is A License for Limerick Nuclear Plant To Pollute – Without Limits.
• Exelon Would be Given 30 Months, AFTER The Permit Is Issued (April, 2013), to do studies to determine their own permit limits – It Would Be Like Us Setting Our Own Tax Rates.
• 24 Pipes Go Into The Schuylkill River From The Limerick Nuclear Plant Site, With An Exemption For Total Dissolved Solids,
Which Include Radiation and Cooling Tower Toxics.
• Concerns About Limerick’s Impacts To The Schuylkill River Now Include:
­ Radioactive and Other Dangerous Pollution Discharged Into The River With No Limit
­ Continued Over-Heating of the River
­ Drought Conditions Concentrating Radiation and Other Toxics Discharged Into The River
­ Cooling Tower Depletion Raising Worries About Dangerously Low River Flows or Even Drying Up
• It goes from Bad to Worse. Nearly 2 Million People Depend On The Schuylkill River for Their Water. There Will Be Less and
Less Usable Water As Populations Increase.
• There Is No Enforcement Power If DEP Passes the Responsibility for TDS Limits To DRBC.
• There Will Be No Future Input On Limerick’s Water Use And Discharges – DRBC’s Director Would Be The River Czar
• Public Officials Need To Speak Out – They’ve Been Negligent So Far – They Need To Get To The Hearing And Speak Out To
Protect the Public’s Water

WATER INCREASES For Limerick Nuclear Plant In DRBC’s Draft Docket – A Threat To Water Supplies Across 6 Counties.

Schuylkill River – Further Jeopardized By DRBC DRAFT Docket

­ INCREASE – 2 MILLION GALLONS MORE WITHDRAWN PER DAY (DRBC Docket)
Currently Limerick Nuclear Plant Withdraws 56.2 Million Gallons Per Day
Limerick Already Withdraws More Than 2 1/2 Times More Than The Total Withdrawn For All Pottstown and Norristown Customers Combined.
­ Pottstown Withdraws 5 Million Gallons Per Day – For 30,000 Customers
­ Norristown Withdraws 17 Million Gallons Per Day – For 87,000 Customers

­ INCREASE – COOLING TOWER USE – 2 MILLION GALLONS MORE PER DAY.
How Can We Afford 2 Million Gallons More Cooling Tower Steam Each Day Knowing It Contains Toxic Chemicals and Dangerous Particulate Matter PM-10
­ DRBC Docket Plans To Allow From 42 to 44 Million Gallons Per Day

 SCHUYLKILL RIVER DEPLETION – LIMERICK’S ROLE IS UNDENIABLE Limerick’s Cooling Towers Depleted Schuylkill River Flows By Billions of Gallons Each Year For Decades, Since 1985.
­ After 27 Years Of Operation, Limerick’s Drastic Water Withdrawals From The Schuylkill River and Cooling Tower Water Use Have Obviously Played A Major Role In Significant Depletion Of The Schuylkill River and Its Tributaries.
­ Limerick Likely Withdrew Over 20 Billion Gallons Of Schuylkill River Water EACH Year, And Only Returned 5 Billion Gallons (Heated and Radioactive).
­ It Would Have Taken 15 Billion Gallons Of Supplementation From Other Sources Each Year Since The Late 1980s To Prevent Depletion. That Didn’t Happen. In Fact, ACE Found No Proof That More Than 3 Billion Gallons Were Supplemented In Any Year.
Residents Who Use The Schuylkill River For Recreation Started Expressing Concern To ACE Over EXTREMELY Low Schuylkill River Flows In 2006.
­ Where They Once Needed A Boat To Cross, They Now Could Walk Across The River. The Manatawny Creek Became Nearly Dried Up. Other Tributaries Are Very Low.
­ Residents’ Concerns About Low Flows Started ACE’s Investigation Into Limerick’s Water Use.
­ DEP’s Own 1999 Booklet, “Water Is Life”, Expressed Concern About What DEP Called “RECORD LOW FLOWS” In the Schuylkill River.
­ DEP’s Contradiction Is Puzzling. While DEP Admitted In 1999 That The Schuylkill River Had Reached Record Low Flows, DEP Is Now Claiming There Is NO Difference In Flows Since Limerick Started Operating.
­ DEP Lost All Credibility In The Community Claiming Flows Didn’t Change.

 ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Why Should More Schuylkill River Water Be Dedicated To Limerick Nuclear Plant? Limerick Should Cut Power, NOT Take 2 Million Gallons PER DAY MORE Of A Vital Public Water Resource.
1. The Schuylkill River Is A Vital Water Resource for Almost Two Million People From Pottstown To Philadelphia. Hospitals, Fire Companies, Schools, And Many Other Businesses Also Depend On The Schuylkill River For Water.
2. Public Demands Are Increasing Through Increased Populations and More Contaminated Groundwater Wells, While Water In The River Is Depleting Through Limerick’s Use and Increasing Heat Waves and Droughts.
3. Depletion Concentrates Limerick’s Radioactive And Other Toxic Discharges.

IMPACTS ON OTHER WATER RESOURCES
DRBC DRAFT DOCKET APPROVALS TO OPERATE LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT

Delaware River By Way Of Perkiomen Creek
• INCREASE – From 42 To 46.2 Million Gallons Per Day

Tamaqua’s Still Creek / Owl Creek Reservoirs
• INCREASE – From 36 to 43.3 Million Gallons Per Day

Wadesville Mine Pit Water
Contaminated Pumping Into The Schuylkill River Continued
• 446.4 Million Gallons Per Month Can Be Pumped UNFILTERED
• @ 10,000 Gallons Per Minute

Groundwater In Schuylkill County Around Wadesville Mine At Risk
DRBC’S DOCKET ALLOWS BILLIONS OF GALLONS OF GROUNDWATER TO CONTINUE TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM SCHUYLKILL COUNTY FOR USE AT LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT IN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, BY WAY OF THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER.
• Since 2003, To Operate Limerick Nuclear Plant, Exelon Pumped Billions Of Gallons Of Contaminated Wadesville Mine Pit Water Into The Schuylkill River.
• It Was Estimated In 1953, That Wadesville Mine Only Started With 3.6 Billion Gallons.
• Wadesville Mine Pit Water Recharges From Surrounding Groundwater In Schuylkill County.
• Even If Mine Water Pumping Is Done 6 Months A Year, That’s Almost 3 Billion Gallons PER YEAR Of Water Transported From Schuylkill County To Limerick.
How Many Years Can This Drain On Groundwater Around Wadesville Mine Continue Before Area Wells Are Impacted?

Groundwater Around Limerick Nuclear Plant
Limerick’s Groundwater Withdrawals Could Jeopardize Residential Well Water.
• Limerick Nuclear Plant Uses Four Groundwater Wells Located Onsite.
• Total Annual Groundwater Withdrawal Allocation – 73.2 Million Gallons Per Year
• Only A Fraction Is Returned To The Ground.
• WELLS WITHIN 1 MILE From The Center Of The Limerick Nuclear Plant Site:
46 Domestic Withdrawal Wells
13 Residences LESS Than 1 Mile From Reactor Building
3 Homes 1 Mile From Reactor Building
2 Commercial Wells
Exelon Was Advised This Allocation Will Only Continue Until 2019. Then What?
With Increasing Heat And Drought Conditions,
 Can Anyone Prove There Will Be Enough Groundwater For Residents, Other Businesses, And Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Huge Groundwater Withdrawals;
 Even Until 2019?
 Until 2029, When Limerick’s Current License Expires?
 Until 2049, If Limerick’s License Is Renewed?

MAJOR INJUSTICE IN DRBC’S DRAFT DOCKET – In Essence, DRBC’s DOCKET ALLOWS “EMINENT DOMAIN” OVER ALL OUR WATER RESOURCES IN THE EVENT OF A LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT ACCIDENT OR MELTDOWN.
• In A Limerick Nuclear Plant Emergency Or Meltdown, Limerick Would Get Unrestricted Access To All Water Resources, Including Groundwater, As Long As The Need Exists – Days, Weeks, Or Months.
­ Limerick Only Stores Enough Emergency Water Onsite For 48 Hours, and That Includes All Limerick’s Cooling Tower Water.
­ Exelon Is Required To Have A 30-Day Supply. They Must Be Counting On All Our Water.
­ What Happens In A Drought?. Groundwater Withdrawals at Limerick Could Run Residential Wells Dry For Miles Around Limerick, As Well As The Schuylkill River.
• We Learned Accidents and Meltdown Threats At Limerick Are Increasing. We Should NOT Face The Risk Of Losing All Access To A Safe, Usable Water Supply Due To Limerick Nuclear Plant.
• Exelon Should Not Be Given Legal Access To All Our Water.
 LIMERICK SHOULD BE CLOSED BEFORE THERE IS A MELTDOWN AND EVERYONE LOSES ALL THEIR WATER RESOURCES.

DANGEROUS DISCHARGES INTO THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER

RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES Into The Schuylkill River From Limerick Nuclear Plant
• Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Routine and Accidental Radioactive Discharges Into The Schuylkill River Are The Most Dangerous Threat To Those Whose Water Comes From The Schuylkill River.
• 5-Year Draft Permits For Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Discharges Have NO LIMITS For ALL Limerick’s Radionuclides Discharged Into the Schuylkill River,
• Limerick’s Radioactive Discharges Can Include Over 100 Different Radionuclides, Some With Very Long Half-lives. For Example, Strontium-90 has a half-life of 28 years. Cesium-137 has a half-life of 30 years.
• Additive, Cumulative, and Synergistic Impacts From All Radionuclides Released From Limerick Nuclear Plant Are Unknown, But Obviously Significant After 27 Years Of Discharges.
• Radionuclides Discharged From Limerick Into The Schuylkill River Do NOT Disappear. They Travel With Schuylkill River Water, But Are Rarely Monitored, Tested, Reported, or Filtered Out At Water Treatment Plants From Limerick to Philadelphia.
• Almost Two Million People Who Use Schuylkill River Water Are Exposed To These Radionuclides Through Their Drinking Water, and Through Food Grown In The Region Using Water From The Schuylkill River.
• Evidence of Harm – Philadelphia Is About 21 Miles Downstream From Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Radioactive Discharges. Philadelphia’s Drinking Water Was Found To Have The Highest Radiation Level Of All 66 Water Treatment Plants Testing Across The Nation After Fukushima. Iodine-131 Was The Radionuclide Tested. Limerick Discharges Iodine-131 Into The Schuylkill River.
• Limerick’s Radionuclides Also Get Into The Sediment and Fish, A Fact Proven By Exelon’s Own Radiological Monitoring Reports To NRC.
• DEP and DRBC Falsely Assert That NRC Protects Us From Limerick’s Radioactive Discharges Into The River. In fact, NRC NEVER TESTED FOR RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES INTO THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER FROM LIMERICK, NEITHER HAVE DRBC OR DEP.
 RADIATION DISCHARGES ARE BEING IGNORED BY DEP AND DRBC.
 THERE IS NO JUSTIFICATION FOR ISSUING THESE 5-YEAR PERMITS THAT RESULT IN LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT ROUTINELY DISCHARGING A BROAD RANGE OF RADIONUCLIDES INTO A VITAL DRINKING WATER SOURCE:
­ WITH NO ACCOUNTABILITY FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF EXPOSURE TO THAT RADIATION
­ WITHOUT REQUIRING LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT TO FILTER
 LIMERICK’S RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES ARE LEGALLY PERMITTED:
­ WITHOUT LIMITS
­ WITHOUT REQUIREMENTS FOR INDEPENDENT MONITORING OF DISCHARGES FOR ALL RADIONUCLIDES ASSOCIATED WITH LIMERICK’S OPERATIONS.
­ WITHOUT REQUIREMENTS FOR EXELON TO FILTER AT THE DISCHARGE POINT
­ WITHOUT REQUIREMENTS FOR WATER COMPANIES TO DO CONTINUOUS MONITORING AND FILTRATION FOR ALL LIMERICK’S RADIONUCLIDES
COOLING TOWER TOXICS ARE DISCHARGED INTO THE SCHUYKILL RIVER
 WITH NO LIMITS
 WITH “EXEMPTIONS” FROM REGULATION IN DEP’S NPDES PERMIT
• Massive Amounts of Extremely Toxic and Corrosive Chemicals Are Dumped Into The Cooling Towers Every Single Day.
• Chlorine is just one of a broad range of toxics used in the cooling towers. Chlorine, As Sodium Hypochlorite, Is Used At Limerick Every Day (16,000 to 58,000 POUNDS PER DAY).
• Most Cooling Tower Toxics Are Not Measured, Regulated, or Reported In Limerick’s Discharges Into The Schuylkill River.

TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDS (TDS) TRANSPORT RADIATION AND COOLING TOWER TOXICS INTO THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER
• Both DEP and Exelon Admit That Limerick Nuclear Plant Cannot Meet Safe Drinking Water Standards (500 mg/L) Under The Clean Water Act For Dangerous Limerick TDS Discharges.
• One 2010 Sample Was Almost 5 Times Higher Than The Safe Drinking Water Standards.
• There Was NO PENALTY, Even Though The Schuylkill River Is A Vital Source Of Drinking Water for Almost 2 Million People From Pottstown To Philadelphia.
• Limerick Nuclear Plant Drastically EXCEEDED Even DRBC’s TDS Discharge Limit of 1,000 mg/L in 13 of 15 Samples for 2010.
• Given The Content Of TDS Discharges From Limerick Nuclear Plant Into A Vital Drinking Water Source, DEP’s NPDES PERMIT IS FAILING TO PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH.
1. DEP MUST REQUIRE FILTRATION FOR TDS FROM LIMERICK’S RADIOACTIVE AND COOLING TOWER DISCHARGE PIPE 001 – NOT PROVIDE A PERMIT EXEMPTION FOR TDS FROM THIS DANGEROUS DISCHARGE PIPE.
2. IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR DEP TO ISSUE POLLUTION DISCHARGE PERMITS TO LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT WITH NO TDS LIMITS, BECAUSE LIMERICK CANNOT MEET STANDARDS IN PLACE TO PROTECT DRINKING WATER.
3. WHY WOULD EXELON BE PERMITTED TO DO THEIR OWN SAMPLING 30 MONTHS “AFTER” PERMITS ARE ISSUED, TO SATISFY DRBC REQUIRMENTS OF 1,000 mg/L?
4. A BODY OF EVIDENCE SHOWS WHY WE CAN’T TRUST EXELON. THEY HAVE A VESTED INTEREST IN THE OUTCOME. WHO COULD BELIEVE THEIR SAMPLING?
5. DEP SHOULD NOT TURN OVER TDS REGULATORY AUTHORITY TO DRBC, AN AGENCY WITH NO TEETH TO REQUIRE ENFORCEMENT OF LIMITS.

24 DISCHARGE POINTS FROM LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT END UP IN THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER.
 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS ARE WOEFULLY INADEQUATE AND UNPROTECTIVE.
• 2 TIMES PER MONTH – Monitoring For Outfall 001, The Most Dangerous Discharge Point Because It Discharges Radiation, Cooling Tower Chemicals, and TDS.
­ NO ONE MONITORS FOR RADIATION OR OTHER COOLING TOWER TOXICS.
Comprehensive Independent Testing From Outfall 001 For All Limerick’s Radionuclides Has Never Been Done By Any Agency, Including NRC, DRBC, nor DEP
­ Without Monitoring For All Radionuclides and Toxics It Is Impossible To Identify Spikes or Determine Health Threats.
­ Without Continuous Monitoring It Is Impossible to Identify Spikes
• 1 TIME PER YEAR – Monitoring for All Other 23 Discharge Points From Limerick’s Site.

Monitoring, Calculating, Testing, And Reporting Are All Unreliable And Unprotective
• Exelon, The Company With A Vested Interest In The Outcome, That Has Shown It Can’t Be Trusted For Full and Timely Disclosure Controls The Entire Process, With Lax Agency Oversight And NO Enforcement for Violations – Details www.acereport.org #20 “Why We Can’t Trust Exelon”
• Exelon’s Monitoring Reports Are Loaded With Loopholes and Deception.
• Water Companies Don’t Protect Your Water From Limerick’s Radioactive Discharges
• 3-19-12 Radioactive Spill, Is An Example Of How Public Health Is Jeopardized By Exelon
­ The Public Was NOT Notified Until 23 Days Later
People From Limerick to Philadelphia Did Not Know It Could Have Been Unsafe To Use Their Water.
­ Regulators / Elected Officials Not Notified Immediately Then Remained Silent. ‘
­ Exelon, NOT WATER COMPANIES, Tested After The Radioactive Spill.

HEATED DISCHARGES – Into The Schuylkill River
• Limerick Discharges 14.2 Million Gallons Per Day = Over 5 Billion Gallons Per Year.
• Discharges Are Permitted To Be As High As 110 Degrees.
• After 27 Years, 135 Billion Gallons Of Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Heated Discharges, Up To 110 Degrees, Obviously Raised The Temperature Of The Schuylkill River From Limerick to Philadelphia.

TEMPERATURES In The Schuylkill River REPEATEDLY EXCEEDED The 87 Degree Limit,
2 MILES DOWNSTREAM From Limerick’s Heated Discharges, At Royersford’s Intake.
• DEP Has An 87 Degree Schuylkill River Water Temperature Limit.
• DRBC’s Ambient Temperature Limit of 87 Degrees For The Schuylkill River.
• 2 Miles Downstream from Limerick’s Heated Discharges The River’s 87 Degree Limit Was Repeatedly EXCEEDED – At Royersford’s PA American Water Intake.
• It is predictable that after 27 years of Limerick Nuclear Plant’s 24/7 highly heated discharges, that the river temperature would EXCEED 87 Degrees.
• Limerick Discharges Are Allowed To Be 110 Degrees, 23 Degrees Higher Than The River’s Temperature Limit.
• Limerick’s heated discharges could be even higher than 110 degrees. ONLY Exelon knows temperatures actually released. There has never been independent long-term heat monitoring by any agency, directly beyond Limerick’s heated discharges into the Schuylkill River.
• Harmful impacts could obviously be significant to ecosystems, yet there has never been a long-term independent study.
• Huge fish kills occurred repeatedly close to Limerick’s heated discharge point. Limerick’s heated, radioactive discharges were the most likely cause, but there was never an independent investigation to prove cause.
 DEP/DRBC NEGLIGENCE.- BOTH AGENCIES INTEND TO ISSUE LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT’S PERMITS ALLOWING HEATED DISCHARGES WITHOUT ADDRESSING THE FACT THAT LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT’S HEATED DISCHARGES ARE OVERHEATING THE RIVER. THERE IS:
­ NO PENALTY FOR OVERHEATING OF THE RIVER
­ NO REQUIREMENT FOR INDEPENDENT RIVER TEMPERATURE MONITORING AT ROYERSFORD, 2 MILES DOWNSTREAM FROM LIMERICK DISCHARGES.
­ NO REQUIREMENT FOR LIMERICK TO CUT POWER, TO LOWER TEMPERATURES, EVEN IN EXTREME HEAT AND DROUGHT.
 THERE IS ONLY A REQUIRMENT “AFTER” THE PERMIT IS ISSUED APRIL 2013, FOR EXELON TO PREPARE A CHART ON HOW OFTEN TEMPERATURES ARE EXCEEDED OVER 87 DEGREES, BASED ON ONLY EXELON’S OWN HEAT MONITORING AT ROYERSFORD.

DRBC’S 59 DEGREE TEMPERATURE RESTRICTION SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED
• DRBC Had A 59 Degree Temperature Restriction Since The Early 1980s, Before Limerick Started To Operate In 1985.
• According to DRBC Documents, The Reason For The 59 Degree Temperature Restriction –
“To Protect Schuylkill River Flow And Water Quality Conditions Until 2020”.
• Dissolved Oxygen Testing Is Easily Manipulated To Hide Elevations, Yet Based Only On Exelon’s Dissolved Oxygen Testing, DRBC Agreed To Eliminate Its Temperature Precaution, Originally In Place To Protect The Schuylkill River Flow and Water Quality Conditions That Were To Be Enforced Until 2020.
• DRBC’s DRAFT DOCKET Removes This Decades Old Protection For Schuylkill River Quality and Flow, Regardless Of Harmful Consequences.
 THIS IS UNACCEPTABLE. EVIDENCE SHOWS WE CAN’T TRUST EXELON.
 DRBC’S 59 DEGREE RESTRICTION SHOULD BE REINSTATED MINIMALLY UNTIL 2020.

TOXIC MINE WATER PUMPING INTO THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER MUST BE FILTERED IF EXELON WANTS TO KEEP USING THAT WATER FOR LIMERICK OPERATIONS.

• DEP Said, “Mine Water Is The Worst Threat To Groundwater In PA”, Yet DEP Is A Cheerleader For Exelon’s Massive Mine Water Pumping (UNFILTERED) Into the Schuylkill River.
• Billions of Gallons Of Toxic, Unfiltered Mine Water Have Been Pumped At 10,000 Gallons PER MINUTE Into The Schuylkill River, A Vital Drinking Water Source, Since 2003, For The Benefit Of Limerick Nuclear Plant Operations and Exelon’s Profits.
• DEP Lost Credibility When Comparing Mine Water Run-Off To Pumping 10,000 Gallons Per Minute And Making The Unsubstantiated Claim That Dilution Is The Answer To This Intentional Pollution.
• If DRBC ‘s Docket for Limerick Is Approved, Billions More Could Be Pumped EVERY YEAR, Compounding And Increasing Problems and Threats.

 This Is Without A Doubt, An Additive And Cumulative Toxic Threat To Public Health Which Can Also Increase Costs To Water Treatment Systems and Their Customers.
 Major Toxics Discharged Into the Schuylkill River Due to Wadesville Mine Water Pumping Include Iron, Manganese, and TDS, All Of Which Were Found Elevated By 2008, After 5 Years of Pumping, At Pottstown Waste Water Treatment Plant, The First Schuylkill River Drinking Water Intake After Wadesville Mine Water Pumping.

• Iron – 20 Times Safe Drinking Water Standards – Discharge Limit From Wadesville Mine Pit Into The Schuylkill River. Iron Can Cause Cancer and Hemochromotosis, As Well As Costly Breakdown Of Equipment At Water Treatment Plants.
• Manganese – 80 Times Safe Drinking Water Standards – Discharge Limit From Wadesville Mine Pit Into The Schuylkill River. Manganese Can Cause Permanent Brain Damage, After 10 Years Of Exposure Through Showering 10 Minutes A Day.
• Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) – Caused Problems At Pottstown After Only A Few Years Of Pumping.

 DRBC’s Docket Allows Exelon To Pump Up to 432 Million Gallons Per Month. Exelon Should Be Required to Filter All Toxic Mine Water Pumped Into The Schuylkill River For Limerick Operations, Or Exelon Should Be Stopped From Pumping It.

Changes Can Be Made To DEP’s Draft Permit Requiring Exelon To Be Accountable To Reduce Toxic Treats To Water And Health, In Order To Follow The Law And To Improve Oversight and Enforcement Of Violations.

PA DEP DRAFT NPDES PERMIT – NO: PA0051926
Urge PA Elected Officials To Ask DEP and Governor Corbett To:
1. Remove Exemption For Radiation And Cooling Toxics In TDS Pollution Discharges
2. Require Strict Enforcement And Meaningful Penalties For Violations Of Clean Water Act Standards
3. Require Independent Comprehensive Testing
4. Require Immediate Notification Of Radioactive Spills
5. Require Exelon To Maintain All Records Permanently, Not Just 3 Years
6. Require Exelon To Filter Or Close Limerick
7. Require Reverse Osmosis Filtration For TDS, With Frequent Filter Changes To Protect The River and Public Health

DRBC’s Planned Approvals For Limerick Nuclear Plant Will Lead To Increased Threats To Public Water In Six Counties

DRBC DRAFT DOCKET – NO. D-1969-210 cp-13
Urge PA Elected Officials To Ask DEP and Governor Corbett To:
1. NOT Allow Increased Water Use for Limerick Nuclear Plant
2. Stop Mine Water Pumping for Limerick Operations or Require Exelon to Filter
3. NOT Issue Limerick’s Docket Without TDS Limits For Outfall 001
4. Require Limerick to Reduce Operations or Shut Down When River Temperatures Exceed 87 Degree Limit
5. Require Unannounced Independent Testing for Low Flow Limits, Temperature Restrictions, and All Radiation and Toxic Chemicals
6. Require Public Notice and Input For All Future Limerick Nuclear Plant Water Use
7. Require An Independent Mediator to Hear and Adjudicate All Water Related Claims Against Limerick and Exelon

If Exelon Refuses To Filter and Comply With Laws To Protect Our Water,
Then Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Water Permits
Should NOT Be Approved and Limerick Should Be Forced To Close.

For More Information – ACE Website www.acereport.org
­ Section #6 – “Schuylkill River, Limerick’s Operations Threaten Drinking Water Disaster”
­ Section #20 – “Why We Can’t Trust Exelon”

To Prevent a Drinking Water Disaster from Pottstown to Philadelphia, Limerick Must Close

The Alliance For A Clean Environment ACE Website Blog Post

Blog Post #4 – May 16 , 2012

To Prevent a Drinking Water Disaster from Pottstown to Philadelphia, Limerick Must Close

Limerick Nuclear Power Plant Radioactive Spills and Routine Radioactive Releases Pose Unprecedented Threats To Drinking Water. Limerick Nuclear Plant Must Shut Down To Protect The Drinking Water Supply For Almost Two Million People From Pottstown To Philadelphia.

Overview: Evidence from the past suggests Limerick Nuclear Plant should never have been constructed here based on its unprecedented threats and harms to drinking water.

DRBC, DEP, and NRC allowed Limerick Nuclear Plant to be constructed here, knowing the Schuylkill River could not sustain the long term extraordinary water needs that would be required to maintain Limerick’s cooling towers, or take the continuous radioactive, and heated discharges from the facility.

Extraordinary harms to the drinking water supply for so many people were obviously inevitable, yet ignored, based on evidence in decades old testimony obtained through FOIA Requests by ACE. Harms and threats have been evident and have increased dramatically, since Limerick was licensed decades ago.

NRC recently confirmed that Limerick Nuclear Plant has had four reported spills in the past four years. Two of them admittedly included radioactive waste. We are expected to take Exelon’s word that the other two contained no radioactive waste. The most recent spill occurred on March 19, 2012, and is addressed in this blog posting.

The situation is virtually assured to get worse, far worse, the longer Limerick depletes and contaminates the Schuylkill River, public drinking water, and groundwater. Now, after decades of damage and deception, regulators owe it to the millions of residents in this region who could face the devastating consequences of losing a safe water supply, to close Limerick Nuclear Plant as soon as possible.

Closing Limerick Is The Moral, Ethical Thing To Do For Precaution and Prevention.

1. Ever- Increasing Potential For Irreversible Drinking Water Disaster

- Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Threats To Public Drinking Water Are Unprecedented, Unacceptable, and Increasing Every Day Limerick Operates.
- If Limerick Continues To Operate There May NOT Be Enough Safe Drinking Water For Almost Two Million People From Pottstown to Philadelphia.
- There is not an endless supply of sea water as at Fukushima, only the public’s ever-shrinking drinking water source, the Schuylkill River.
- 4-18-12, at NRC’s meeting in Limerick, ACE asked where the water would come from to deal with Limerick meltdowns, and where would the highly radioactive run-off go?
NRC response 5-9-12:
• There is only enough water for 48 hours of continuous use (including water from the cooling towers, spray pond and ground water tanks. After that it would come from the Schuylkill River. At Fukushima they continued to need water for months after the disaster.
• NRC failed to respond to where the radioactive run-off would go.

2. Signs of Dangerous Water Contamination Threats To Public Health From
Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Routine Operations Are Already Evident.

Radiation
- Drinking water from the Schuylkill River is already radioactive from Limerick Nuclear Plant’s routine operations.
- Radiation is showing up at some of the highest levels in the nation in Philadelphia water.
- EPA water testing after Fukushima found Iodine-131 in Philadelphia water at the highest levels of all other nuclear plants tested.
- Limerick Nuclear Plant’s routine wastewater discharges are obviously already a major factor in the Iodine-131 radiation found in Philadelphia drinking water.
- Obviously water from the Schuylkill River would NOT be safe to use after a meltdown, even if there was enough.

Iron and Manganese
- To supplement the Schuylkill River flow for Limerick Nuclear Plant operations, starting in 2003, Exelon pumped massive amounts of unfiltered mine water, loaded with iron and manganese, into the Schuylkill River.
- By 2008, Pottstown, the first public drinking water intake showed elevated levels of iron and manganese in testing.

Double Increase In Pollution Discharges From Limerick Nuclear Plant
Exelon’s Request for Limerick Nuclear Plant Discharges to the Schuylkill River (NPDES Permit)
- Instead of providing filtration, Exelon is asking for a permit limit increase that is four times safe drinking water standards.
- If approved, this will increase threats to health and costs for water to those depending on water companies that draw water from the Schuylkill River.

3. Limerick Nuclear Plant’s 3-19-12 Radioactive Spill
Illustrates How The System Fails To Protect Public Health Related To Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Radioactive Threats To Drinking Water.

- A significant Limerick Nuclear Plant radioactive spill was discovered by a guard March 19, 2012 at 3:00 AM. Exelon claims the spill started at 1:35 AM on March 19th. However, there is no independent verification of how long the spill from Outfall 023 continued before it was accidentally detected by the guard at 3:00 AM
- Exelon negligently failed to notify the public for over three weeks, then downplayed the spill, describing what they claimed was a 15,000 gallon spill as a puddle, and asserting that it contained only one kind of radiation, tritium.
- This was hardly just a simple harmless “spill” when it knocked off a manhole cover, lasted days, and was significant enough to cause visible erosion (according to NRC resident inspectors). Water blew off a manhole cover and ran out a large pipe for a long period of time into Possum Hollow Run Streambed (Discharge Point 023) and into the Schuylkill River.
- As much as 15,000 gallons of radioactive reactor water spilled (Estimated by Exelon) with no verification whatsoever. Radioactive spill could be at least several hundred thousand gallons.
• NRC officials admitted to ACE 4-18-12, that NRC is not really sure how much water was released. NRC made no attempt to independently verify Exelon’s estimate.
• Exelon’s math is fuzzy
- Intentional Deception? Discrepancies in Reporting On Limerick’s Spill
• NRC illogically protested to a reporter that Exelon should have reported it to NRC, which would automatically get posted on the NRC website. However, Exelon did report it to on-site NRC officials, March 19, 16 hours after the spill. NRC should have immediately reported the spill to the media.
 NRC’s website posting, didn’t come until April 11, 2012, several weeks after the spill.
 NRC failed to protect public health by failing to immediately notify the public.
• NRC officials said spill went unreported immediately because “Exelon determined it was NOT reportable”.
 This appears to have been a convenient delay to avoid full and accurate disclosure during the worst part of the consequences.
 Three weeks after the 3-19-12 spill, on 4-11-12 when independent verification was no longer an option, Exelon filed a report to NRC.
• NRC had few answers about the spill by 4-18-12, knowing they would be questioned about the spill at their annual meeting on Limerick.
- The public had NO idea Limerick’s radioactive “spill” occurred, because no public announcement was made at the time of the spill.
- 16 hours after the spill was detected, at 5:00 PM on March 19th, Exelon implemented additional controls to prevent the overflow.
- NRC’s resident inspectors were first notified by Exelon at 5:00 PM on March 19th, 16 hours after the spill was first detected. NRC should have provided immediate full public disclosure about the radioactive spill to try to protect public health.
- 3-20, the next day, NRC dispatched a “radiation specialist” to review the event and Exelon’s actions. Apparently little was learned. When NRC held its annual Limerick meeting 4-18-12, NRC inspectors could not provide very important details on the spill.
- 40 hours after the spill was first detected, state and local officials were informed (5:00 PM on 3-20) They were told Increased levels of tritium were found in water samples collected from the spill area. Exelon failed to provide officials with full, accurate, and timely disclosure.
- Even after public officials were informed 3-20 – almost two days after the spill – NOT ONE notified the public. Who was notified, but then failed to inform the public?
- The cause of the back-up was not unclogged and cleared by Exelon until 3-21, two days after the spill was first discovered.
- Exelon claimed the cause of the backup of cooling tower blowdown and reactor water was due to clogging of the Schuylkill River diffuser (Limerick’s Radioactive Discharge Pipe – Outfall 001)
- Exelon failed to make an official notification to NRC or state and local elected officials until 23 days after the spill, after which the public was finally notified by the Pottstown Mercury.
- Evan Brandt did excellent reporting in the Pottstown Mercury to notify the public, but only over 3 weeks after the spill, when it finally appeared on NRC’s website.
- Exelon told Mercury reporter Brandt the spill of reactor water into the river was “No Big Deal” and it was a “Permitted Discharge”. While deceptively attempting to assert no harm, this was the first time Exelon admitted that Limerick has routine radioactive discharges into a vital source of drinking water, the Schuylkill River.
- Limerick’s spill impacted the water of over 1 1/2 million people from Phoenixville to Philadelphia.

4. The Tritium Scam

NRC and Exelon attempted to make us believe Limerick’s leak was just one radinuclide, tritium, and that tritium levels were within some magical deceptive “safe limit”.

THE TRUTH IS:
- LIMERICK’S SPILL WAS NOT JUST TRITIUM
- RESEARCH SHOWS TRITIUM IS VERY HARMFUL TO HEALTH
- Even if Limerick’s spill would have been just tritium,
• How can NRC claim 20,000 picocuries per liter of tritium is a safe limit?
• or Exelon claim 5 times that amount is NO BIG DEAL?
- Customers of water companies drawing from the Schuylkill River were just exposed to elevated levels of the synergistic impacts from many dangerous radionuclides that entered the Schuylkill River as a result of Limerick Nuclear Plant’s radioactive spill.

5. Exelon’s Track Record Here and Elsewhere Shows Why We Can’t Trust Them To Provide Accurate and Timely Disclosure.

- Yet Exelon controls all Limerick Nuclear Plant monitoring, testing, and reporting.
• Specifics showing why we can’t trust Exelon’s data – See Section 20 www.acereport.org.
• To determine our radiation risks from Limerick Nuclear Plant, we basically rely on the company with a vested interest in the outcome that can’t be trusted.
- The recent spill is a perfect example of how Exelon avoids full, accurate, timely disclosure.
- To assert there is no risk from radioactive discharges from Limerick’s reactor
into a public drinking water source defies logic and reality.
- To assert water from Limerick’s reactor is only tritium is a shameful lie.

Dr. Lewis Cuthbert
ACE President

Limerick Nuclear Plant Must Shut Down Before It Melts Down

The Alliance For A Clean Environment ACE Website Blog Post

Blog Post #3 – May 13, 2012

Limerick Nuclear Plant Must Shut Down Before It Melts Down

1. Meltdowns Can Be Triggered By Loss of Power and Loss of Water.
 Earthquakes Can Trigger Meltdowns.
 Limerick Is Considered A VERY High Risk Nuke Plant – 3rd On The Nation’s Quake-Risk List
 The Questions Is – Why Was Limerick Allowed To Be Constructed Here Right Over An Earthquake Fault, And So Close To So Many Others, Including One That Has Been Active?

In 1972 – Limerick Proceeded Without A License For Construction Or Permission -
BEFORE Limerick’s Earthquake Study Was Even Completed In 1974
– Exelon’s Fact Sheet Claims Limerick Construction Began In 1974.
• But November 15, 2972, before PECO ever received a permit, a mammoth 90-wheel truck, escorted by police, carried a new nuclear reactor vessel to the Limerick site in Pottstown.
• Attorney Lawrence Sager told the Mercury,
“It shows … arrogance of the utility. It has no license for construction, nor permission to proceed, and yet they moved the vital parts onto the site.”

Cover Up? Evaluate NRC’s Omissions and/or Confusion Regarding Earthquake Faults Under and Near Limerick Nuclear Plant. You decide.

- ACE members recently confirmed that there is a fault right under the Limerick Nuclear Plant site. They discovered this in the Pottstown Library from a 1974 geological study done for Limerick’s original licensing,
• The Sanatoga Fault is right under Limerick Nuclear Plant, yet NRC failed to disclose that fault under Limerick or two others within 2 miles of Limerick when asked to identify the closest faults to Limerick by a local Mother very concerned after knowing an earthquake triggered the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster.

- Two other faults were identified by NRC in a letter and map sent to the resident 10/11 – After multiple requests and over 5 months after the original 5-11 request.
• The resident’s letter and map identified ONLY faults 9 and 17 miles from Limerick.
9 miles – Chalfont Fault 17 miles away – Ramapo Fault
• At NRC”s 4-18-12 meeting in Limerick, NRC officials appeared totally unaware of the fault right under Limerick Nuclear Plant.
• The NRC official who sent the letter and map which failed to identify the fault under Limerick, admitted 4-18-12 that the Ramapo fault 17 miles from Limerick was active with 2 or 3 quakes.
• He also expressed concern about the quarry next to the Limerick site.

- A cover-up to construct Limerick? Just Like North Anna in Virginia?
• The geological study revealing the Sanatoga Fault right under Limerick Nuclear Plant was completed in 1974.
• But in 1972, the first Limerick reactor was already delivered to the site.
• There was a documented earthquake fault cover-up in order to push through the construction of North Anna. The risk was uncovered and challenged in court, but the company only paid a fine and proceeded with construction.
• Limerick’s generator was already delivered before the earthquake study was reported.
• Now it appears to many, that NRC is covering up the risk, after the fact.
• 5-9-12 NRC responded to ACE questions 4-18-12 about the fault under Limerick. NRC points to 3 faults within 2 miles of Limerick, but fails to address the fact that the Sanatoga Fault is directly under the Limerick Nuclear Plant site.
• NRC points us to a 1983 Safety Evaluation Report which concludes there are “no capable faults” in the site area. That study is outdated and no longer valid based on new information. In 2011 we saw earthquakes becoming far stronger and more frequent, a risk that will only increase with fracking of thousands of gas wells in PA.
• NRC even contradicted that conclusion when admitting the Ramapo fault is active.

- Earthquake threats are stronger and more frequent
• Earthquakes Triggered Fukushima Meltdowns
• 8-23-12 Virginia quake shook our region – Limerick had to check for damage, but the place an earthquake is most likely to cause damage is also the place hardest to inspect – underground.
• Damage is hard to detect in the miles of buried underground pipes and cables under the 600 acre Limerick site. What could happen from earthquakes in faults so close to and under Limerick?

- Fracking Could Trigger An Earthquake at Limerick
• A 2012 USGS study confirmed that fracking can trigger earthquakes
• In PA 4,200 natural gas wells have been approved since 2007
• Many, including a high-ranking NRC official, are even concerned about the quarry very close to Limerick, especially now knowing there is a fault right under Limerick.

- Limerick is considered a high-risk nuke, ranked 3rd on the nation’s quake-risk list
• Yet, Limerick is not required to comply with KEY seismic safety upgrades until 2017
NRC’S NEGLIGENT EXCUSE – “Limited Resources – Prioritizing” Rick Ennis 4-18-12
NRC couldn’t answer how you fix earthquake faults under and too close to Limerick.

2. Safety of Limerick’s Design Was Challenged In 1981 In Federal Court,
YEARS BEFORE Limerick Completion. Construction Should Have Been
Halted In 1981, Pending The Decision. It Was About Safety In Design

In 1981 Limerick Ecology Action sued in federal court – Accusing NRC (AEC) of:
- Violating the National Environmental Policy Act
- Not Considering Safety Enhancing Design Alternatives For Limerick Nuclear Plant.
NRC was ordered to listen to LEA’s proposals by the 3rd circuit court of appeals in Philadelphia.
- The order was a major embarrassment to NRC and setback for PECO.
Reported in Mercury “David Against Federal Goliath” – September 28, 1997
The case dragged on nearly 9 years – the decision came too late:
- Unit 1 was Finished
- Unit 2 Completion was Approved.

3. Limerick’s Design Flaws Are A Serious Threat To The Entire Philadelphia
Region
- Limerick’s reactor containment is substandard, meaning more radiation would be released in an accident or attack.
- 9-22-11 A quality assurance engineer at the time cement was poured for Limerick’s fuel pools testified that cement was faulty.
- 5-9-12 – NRC substantiated that “there were deviations in a concrete pour for the spent fuel pool.”
- NRC admitted to ACE 5-9-12 – At the time of construction NRC (AEC) claimed there would be “no adverse effect on the structural adequacy of the spent fuel pool”. In other words, even with potentially deadly consequences, NRC overlooked and allowed substandard cement to be used for very critical fuel pool construction.
- That negligent conclusion was accepted decades ago, but NOT NOW, with increasing threats to Limerick’s fuel pool integrity from both earthquakes and terrorist attacks,
- The quality assurance engineer, Dan Ely, expressed heightened concerns 9-22-11, due to increased risk of stronger and more frequent earthquakes and other natural disasters.
This should be enough of a concern to NRC and elected officials in our entire region to call for closure of Limerick to prevent devastation to the entire Philadelphia region.

4. Limerick’s Densely Packed Deadly Fuel Pools Are Highly Vulnerable To
Meltdown

- Cement holding Limerick’s Deadly Radioactive Wastes Is Substandard.

- Large volumes (over 6,000 assemblies-1,000 tons), of Limerick’s highly radioactive wastes (spent fuel rods) are stored in Limerick’s densely packed fuel pools, elevated five stories above and outside the reinforced containment structure for the reactor.

- After decades of holding all Limerick’s highly radioactive and heated “spent fuel” rods, Limerick’s substandard cement could crumble like a tea cup from a strong earthquake or a terrorist attack with a plane or missile.

- Limerick’s Fuel Pools are similar to Fukushima’s, but Limerick’s 2 fuel pools hold far more deadly spent fuel than 4 of Fukushima’s.

- A 2011 Study On DOE Records Shows Limerick’s 2 Fuel Pools Hold:
• Almost three times more than four of Fukushima’s fuel pools
• Far more than many U.S. nuclear plants, including Exelon’s TMI and Oyster Creek
• Far more than the reactors

- With loss of cooling water, Limerick’s fuel rods can heat up, self-ignite, and burn in an unstoppable fire.

- Fire in a spent fuel pool could release enough cesium-137 “to render about 95,000 square kilometers of land uninhabitable” (Comparable to covering about 75% of New York)

- Loss of water from Limerick’s fuel pools could create a disaster far worse than Chernobyl and 100 times worse than Hiroshima.

- A meltdown from loss of water in a spent fuel pool could cause fatal radiation-induced cancer in thousands of people as far as 500 miles from the site according to a 2000 NRC study.

- Limerick’s “Spent Fuel” pools are at high risk from loss of cooling water due to:
• Earthquakes
• Leakage and/or Evaporation
• Reactor Failure
• Explosion Inside or Outside Pool Building
• Terrorist Acts Including Aircraft Impact or Missiles

- Fuel Pools are especially vulnerable to aircraft penetration. Still, Exelon has not been required to spend the money to guard Limerick against terrorists’ missiles or air strikes.

- A 2004 Study by Dr. Edwin Lyman, Senior Scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, Concluded:
• As many as 44,000 near-term deaths from acute radiation poisoning
• 518,000 long term deaths from cancer.
• Deaths could occur among people living as far as 60 miles downwind.
- A 2003 study by Dr. Frank Von Hippel, Director of Science and Global Security at Princeton University, concluded that:
• A successful terrorist attack on a spent fuel storage pool could have consequences “significantly worse than Chernobyl.”
• A catastrophic spent fuel fire could release a radiation plume that could contaminate 8 to 70 times more land than Chernobyl. (Would include the entire Philadelphia Metropolitan Region).
- How dangerous is “spent fuel”?
• Standing 1 yard away unshielded can cause death in less than 3 minutes.
• 30 seconds of exposure can cause significant increased risk of cancer and genetic damage.

5. Deja Vu – Limerick’s Serious Safety Concerns Are Being Ignored By NRC
Yet Again.
- In 2011, the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Intervened On Our Behalf Against Limerick Nuclear Plant Relicensing, Accusing Limerick of Dodging A New Safety Study
- NRDC Said “Limerick’s Safety Analysis Is Decades Out Of Date. A New Limerick Safety Analysis Is Necessary.” NRDC Cited Limerick’s Obsolete Severe Accident Mitigation Study. NRDC’s Director Said,
• “After Fukushima, it seems just plain nutty not to require a new study on Limerick’s Boiling Water Reactors similar to those at Fukushima.”
• “Exelon and NRC blithely maintain they have NO reason to take another look at Limerick’s Severe Accident Mitigation Analysis”
- The licensing board ruled in favor of NRDC, but Exelon and NRC (the agency supposedly protecting our safety) appealed the decision, even though this is about our safety.
Why would Exelon and NRC fight so hard against a new safety study?
- Many believe Limerick should have to close as a result of a new safety study.

Dr. Lewis Cuthbert
ACE President

Earthquake Risks – Cover-up at Limerick?

The Alliance For A Clean Environment ACE Website Blog Post

Blog Post #2 – April 29, 2012

Earthquake Risks – Cover-up at Limerick?

What did the company and federal regulators know about earthquake faults near the site of Limerick Nuclear Power Plant, and when did they know it? What risks associated with damage from an earthquake close to the plant were overlooked, or even worse, withheld from the public in order to enable the nuclear plant to be built? Will updated, current information be overlooked in order to approve the request to relicense Limerick for an additional 20 years?

After the Fukushima nuclear disaster, it was reported in March 2011 that Limerick ranked third in the nation on the Earthquake Risk List. The August, 2011, Virginia earthquake resulted in months of shutdown at the North Ana Nuclear Plant, and the tremors were felt at Limerick.

It took nearly five months in 2011, and persistent repeated requests, to get the NRC to even respond to a concerned community member about earthquake fault lines and the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant site. The answer from NRC included a map that showed two fault lines within 17 miles of the plant. The Ramapo Fault was 17 miles away, and the Chalfont Fault was only 9 miles away.

Two residents who had been concerned about earthquake fault risks in the area since the 1970′s contacted ACE, and researched the topic. In April 2012, they found a map in the Pottstown Library, from the 1974 Geological Report for Limerick’s “Preliminary Safety Analysis Report”, which shows that there is also an earthquake fault directly under the Limerick Nuclear Plant site. It is the Sanatoga Fault.

This information was presented to NRC officials at their public meeting on April 18, 2012. NRC officials seemed surprised to learn about the Sanatoga Fault. To date, the NRC is refusing to require a new, or updated, Safety Analysis for Limerick as part of the relicensing process.

Earthquakes are becoming more frequent and severe. A 2012 USGS study confirmed that gas well fracking can cause earthquakes. Since 2007, PA has approved 4,200 natural gas wells. Evidence shows that earthquakes can trigger meltdowns at nuclear plants.

It appears that federal regulators may have “looked the other way” in the 1970′s and 1980′s and ignored several risk factors, including earthquake potential, while allowing the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant to be built contrary to public interest and safety. What can our community expect from the NRC regarding Exelon’s relicensing request?

An updated Safety Analysis would have to consider the presence of all three earthquake fault lines on and near the plant, as well as the updated earthquake risk status of Limerick. Those facts alone should result in closing the plant, not adding 20 more years to the life of licenses for the aging reactors at the site.

Dr. Lewis Cuthbert
ACE President

Action Alert!

How You Can Help

Prevent Threats, Harms,
And Meltdown

At Limerick Nuclear
Plant

Evidence Is Clear!

Limerick
Nuclear Plant’s Unprecedented Harms and Threats To Your Health, Safety, and
Quality of Life Will Increase Every Day Limerick Continues To Operate.

The Best
Way To Try To Eliminate Inherent Threats Is To Close Limerick.   Limerick Can’t Be Made Failsafe.   Many Serious Limerick Design Flaws and
Earthquake Risks Can’t Be Fixed.   To
Keep Limerick Open Is Like Playing Russian Roulette.

The
Evidence Shows Limerick Is Far Too Vulnerable To Meltdowns In Reactors and Fuel
Pools, Through Accidents, Natural Disasters Like Earthquakes, Corrosion and
Aging, and Terrorist Attacks By Planes, Missiles, and Cyber Attacks.

The Only
Way To Close Limerick Is To Get Elected Officials To Face The Facts And Speak
Out.

To Get
Elected Officials To Value Your Health, Safety, and Quality of Life Over
Exelon’s Profits and Donations To Their Campaigns You Need To Speak Out

  1. 1.    CONTACT ALL ELECTED OFFICIALS.  Urge
    Them To Get The Facts From A Public Interest Source With No Vested Interest,
    www.acereport.org.   Ask Them To Demand
    Closing Of Limerick Nuclear Plant.
  2. 2.    SIGN ACE PETITION TO CLOSE LIMERICK NUCLEAR PLANT.  

Please
Print!  Be Sure To Provide Phone And
E-Mail Address.  

ACE
Will Update You On Important Issues.

  1. 3.    DOWNLOAD AND CIRCULATE THE PETITION TO CLOSE LIMERICK.  

Give
Copies To Friends, Neighbors, Co-Workers and Family In The Philadelphia Region.   (Ask Them To Sign The Petition And Include
Phone and E-Mails) 

Send Signed Petitions To: 

Donna Cuthbert, ACE

1189 Foxview Road

Pottstown, PA
19465

For Details On Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Threats and Harms

www.acereport.org

Questions?  

aceactivists@comcast.net – Subject: Limerick

            `                Call (610) 326-2387 – Leave your name and
phone number. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Why Reduce Radiation Risks?

Why Reduce Radiation Risks

Radioactive Particulates Emitted Into Our Air

From Japan’s Nuclear Disaster   +   Limerick Nuclear Plant’s Routine Operations

Can Present Significant Health Threats To You And Your Family, Especially Children

  • To Better Understand How and Why Contact ACE (610) 326-2387

Ways To Minimize Risks

From Radiation Emissions

  •   Filter Water For Drinking, Cooking, Washing Food

ü  With Reverse Osmosis Filter – Must Have Pre and Post Carbon

                  Can Purchase Quality Unit From Suburban Water Technology, Gilbertsville

  •   Soak / Rinse Fruits and Vegetables To Limit Radioactive Particulates

ü  Soak For Extended Time In Bentonite Clay Liquid or Powder

With Toxic-Free Veggie Wash – Use Filtered Water to Soak and Rinse

  •   Limit Time Outdoors During Participation

    Demand Elected Officials Provide Radioactive Particulate Alerts (like for Ozone)

  •   Leave Shoes At The Door – In Precipitation, Leave Outer Clothes At Door.  
  •   If You Believe You Were Exposed To Higher Than Normal Levels Of Radiation

  Emissions From An Accident or Terrorist Attack At Limerick Nuclear Plant:

ü  Wear A Protective Mask.

ü  Change Clothes and Shoes – Put Exposed Items In A Plastic Bag.  Seal The Bag and  Place It Out Of The Way.

ü  Take A Thorough Shower.

ü  Seek Medical Attention If Available.

ü  Follow Emergency Management Directions.

ü  To Protect Specific Organs Attacked By Specific Radionuclides Entering The Body, You

Can Take Supplements Recommended By Physicians and Nutritionists Knowledgeable

About Exposure From Nuclear Plant Radionuclides.

  •   Reduce Radiation Exposure Impacts Using Supplements Recommended by

  Physicians, Experts -  Certified Radiation FREE

  •   Suggestions To Protect Yourself Nutritionally:

Dr. Ann Louise Gittleman Recommends a Comprehensive Approach:

ü  Sea Vegetables – Tested for Radiation

ü  Foods High in Beta-Carotine

ü  Potassium

ü  Calcium

ü  Mineral-Rich Foods

ü  Potassium Iodide, if necessary

Speak Out Now! Say NO To Limerick Operating Until 2049

Speak Out Now!
Say NO To Limerick
Operating Until 2049

The Alliance For A Clean Environment compiled research, permits, and other related information for over 11 years.

For Detailed Information On Limerick Nuclear Plant Issues Listed Above Or
To Arrange A Presentation For Your Family, Neighbors, Church, or Civic and Community Organization
Contact: Dr. Lewis or Donna Cuthbert (610) 326-2387
aceactivists@comcast.net

For more information on the harms and risks from nuclear power:
www.radiation.org    www.nirs.org    www.beyondnuclear.org